Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Davis Vs. Mississippi

Davis vs Mississippi

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided 1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/102148

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 821
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Davis

Respondent

Mississippi

Excerpt

davis v. mississippi - 393 u.s. 821 (1968) u.s. supreme court davis v. mississippi , 393 u.s. 821 (1968) 393 u.s. 821 john davis, petitioner, v. mississippi. no. 60, misc. supreme court of the united states october 14, 1968 jack greenberg, michael meltsner, melvyn zarr, anthony g. amsterdam and jack young, for petitioner. joe t. patterson, atty. gen. of mississippi, and g. garland lyell, jr ., asst. atty. gen., for respondent. motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of mississippi granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows: 'whether the introduction into evidence at petitioner's criminal trial of his fingerprints, taken as a result of petitioner's illegal arrest, violated petitioner's rights under the fourth and fourteenth amendments?' case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ davis v. mississippi 393 u.s. 821 (1968) ]

Full Judgment

DAVIS v. MISSISSIPPI - 393 U.S. 821 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court DAVIS v. MISSISSIPPI , 393 U.S. 821 (1968)

393 U.S. 821

John DAVIS, petitioner,
v.
MISSISSIPPI.
No. 60, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 14, 1968

Jack Greenberg, Michael Meltsner, Melvyn Zarr, Anthony G. Amsterdam and Jack Young, for petitioner.

Joe T. Patterson, Atty. Gen. of Mississippi, and G. Garland Lyell, Jr ., Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Mississippi granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows:

    'Whether the introduction into evidence at petitioner's criminal trial of his fingerprints, taken as a result of petitioner's illegal arrest, violated petitioner's rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments?' Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ Davis v. Mississippi 393 U.S. 821 (1968) ]


Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial