Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rosso Vs. Puerto Rico

Rosso vs Puerto Rico

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1968
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101891

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
393 U.S. 14
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rosso

Respondent

Puerto Rico

Excerpt

rosso v. puerto rico - 393 u.s. 14 (1968) u.s. supreme court rosso v. puerto rico, 393 u.s. 14 (1968) 393 u.s. 14 rosso et ux. v. puerto rico. appeal from the supreme court of puerto rico. no. 242. decided october 14, 1968. ___ p. r. r. ___, appeal dismissed. walter l. newsom, jr., and james b. donovan for appellants. rafael a. rivera-cruz, solicitor general of puerto rico, j. f. rodriguez-rivera, deputy solicitor general, and peter ortiz, assistant solicitor general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. roberts, judge v. pollard, 393 u.s. 14 (1968) 393 u.s. 14 (1968) "> u.s. supreme court roberts, judge v. pollard, 393 u.s. 14 (1968) 393 u.s. 14 roberts, judge, et al. v. pollard et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of arkansas. no. 251. decided october 14, 1968. 283 f. supp. 248, affirmed. joe purcell, attorney general of arkansas, and don langston, deputy attorney general, for appellants. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 393 u.s. 14, 15

Full Judgment

ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO - 393 U.S. 14 (1968)
U.S. Supreme Court ROSSO v. PUERTO RICO, 393 U.S. 14 (1968) 393 U.S. 14

ROSSO ET UX. v. PUERTO RICO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PUERTO RICO.
No. 242.
Decided October 14, 1968.

___ P. R. R. ___, appeal dismissed.

Walter L. Newsom, Jr., and James B. Donovan for appellants.

Rafael A. Rivera-Cruz, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, J. F. Rodriguez-Rivera, Deputy Solicitor General, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


ROBERTS, JUDGE v. POLLARD, <a href="/101891"> 393 U.S. 14 </a> (1968) 393 U.S. 14 (1968) "> U.S. Supreme Court ROBERTS, JUDGE v. POLLARD, 393 U.S. 14 (1968) 393 U.S. 14

ROBERTS, JUDGE, ET AL. v. POLLARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 251.
Decided October 14, 1968.

283 F. Supp. 248, affirmed.

Joe Purcell, Attorney General of Arkansas, and Don Langston, Deputy Attorney General, for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 393 U.S. 14, 15



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial