Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nave Vs. City of Seattle

Nave vs City of Seattle

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jan-09-1967
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101803

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
385 U.S. 450
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nave

Respondent

City of Seattle

Excerpt

nave v. city of seattle - 385 u.s. 450 (1967) u.s. supreme court nave v. city of seattle, 385 u.s. 450 (1967) 385 u.s. 450 nave v. city of seattle. appeal from the supreme court of washington. no. 767. decided january 9, 1967. 68 wash. 2d 72, î 415 p.2d 93, appeal dismissed. footnotes [ footnote î ] errata: "72" in "68 wash. 2d 72" should be "721". appellant pro se. a. l. newbould for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 385 u.s. 450, 451 kirkpatrick v. preisler, 385 u.s. 450 (1967) 385 u.s. 450 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court kirkpatrick v. preisler, 385 u.s. 450 (1967) 385 u.s. 450 kirkpatrick, secretary of state of missouri, et al. v. preisler et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of missouri. no. 738. decided january 9, 1967. 257 f. supp. 953, affirmed. norman h. anderson, attorney general of missouri, and j. gordon siddens and thomas j. downey, assistant attorneys general, for appellants. paul w. preisler, pro se, and for other appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Full Judgment

NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE - 385 U.S. 450 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE, 385 U.S. 450 (1967) 385 U.S. 450

NAVE v. CITY OF SEATTLE.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 767.
Decided January 9, 1967.

68 Wash. 2d 72, î 415 P.2d 93, appeal dismissed.

Footnotes [ Footnote î ] ERRATA: "72" in "68 Wash. 2d 72" should be "721".

Appellant pro se.

A. L. Newbould for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 450, 451


KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, <a href="/101803"> 385 U.S. 450 </a> (1967) 385 U.S. 450 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court KIRKPATRICK v. PREISLER, 385 U.S. 450 (1967) 385 U.S. 450

KIRKPATRICK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MISSOURI, ET AL. v. PREISLER ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
MISSOURI. No. 738.
Decided January 9, 1967.

257 F. Supp. 953, affirmed.

Norman H. Anderson, Attorney General of Missouri, and J. Gordon Siddens and Thomas J. Downey, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellants.

Paul W. Preisler, pro se, and for other appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial