Boyden Vs. May

Boyden vs May

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-10-1966

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/101328

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/101328
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Oct-10-1966
Case Number: 385 U.S. 15
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Boyden

Respondent

May

Excerpt

boyden v. may - 385 u.s. 15 (1966) u.s. supreme court boyden v. may, 385 u.s. 15 (1966) 385 u.s. 15 boyden v. may, warden. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of washington. no. 351, misc. decided october 10, 1966. appeal dismissed. appellant pro se. solicitor general marshall for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. bradford v. helman, 385 u.s. 15 (1966) 385 u.s. 15 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court bradford v. helman, 385 u.s. 15 (1966) 385 u.s. 15 bradford v. helman, justice of the supreme court of the state of new york, et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 389, misc. decided october 10, 1966. appeal dismissed. appellant pro se. louis j. lefkowitz, attorney general of new york, samuel a. hirshowitz, first assistant attorney general, and brenda soloff, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 385 u.s. 15, 16

Full Judgment

BOYDEN v. MAY - 385 U.S. 15 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court BOYDEN v. MAY, 385 U.S. 15 (1966) 385 U.S. 15

BOYDEN v. MAY, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 351, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Solicitor General Marshall for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

BRADFORD v. HELMAN, <a href="/101328"> 385 U.S. 15 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 15 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BRADFORD v. HELMAN, 385 U.S. 15 (1966) 385 U.S. 15

BRADFORD v. HELMAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 389, Misc.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 15, 16

Same Parties Boyden vs May Same Subject Criminal