Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re Crow

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-30-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100940

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 647
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Crow

Excerpt

in re crow - 376 u.s. 647 (1964) u.s. supreme court in re crow, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 in re crow. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 767. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. william b. saxbe, attorney general of ohio, for the supreme court of ohio, in opposition. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. port of brookings v. united states, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court port of brookings v. united states, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 port of brookings et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of oregon. no. 771. decided march 30, 1964. affirmed. lloyd hammel, assistant attorney general of oregon, and sidney teiser for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane, h. neil garson and betty jo christian for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. page 376 u.s. 647, 648

Full Judgment

IN RE CROW - 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100940"> 376 U.S. 647 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 647 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Affirmed.

Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 376 U.S. 647, 648



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial