Skip to content
Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

In Re Crow

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Mar-30-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100940
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
376 U.S. 647

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re Crow

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

in re crow - 376 u.s. 647 (1964) u.s. supreme court in re crow, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 in re crow. appeal from the supreme court of ohio. no. 767. decided march 30, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. appellant pro se. william b. saxbe, attorney general of ohio, for the supreme court of ohio, in opposition. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. port of brookings v. united states, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court port of brookings v. united states, 376 u.s. 647 (1964) 376 u.s. 647 port of brookings et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of oregon. no. 771. decided march 30, 1964. affirmed. lloyd hammel, assistant attorney general of oregon, and sidney teiser for appellants. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general orrick, lionel kestenbaum, robert w. ginnane, h. neil garso

Full Judgment

IN RE CROW - 376 U.S. 647 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court IN RE CROW, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

IN RE CROW.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 767.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Appellant pro se.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, for the Supreme Court of Ohio, in opposition.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/100940"> 376 U.S. 647 </a> (1964) 376 U.S. 647 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court PORT OF BROOKINGS v. UNITED STATES, 376 U.S. 647 (1964) 376 U.S. 647

PORT OF BROOKINGS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 771.
Decided March 30, 1964.

Affirmed.

Lloyd Hammel, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, and Sidney Teiser for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel Kestenbaum, Robert W. Ginnane, H. Neil Garson and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 376 U.S. 647, 648




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial