Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Bennett Vs. County of Dade

Bennett vs County of Dade

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-12-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100786

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
379 U.S. 8
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bennett

Respondent

County of Dade

Excerpt

bennett v. county of dade - 379 u.s. 8 (1964) u.s. supreme court bennett v. county of dade, 379 u.s. 8 (1964) 379 u.s. 8 bennett v. county of dade, florida. appeal from the supreme court of florida. no. 275, misc. decided october 12, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 379 u.s. 8, 9 yorty v. jordan, 379 u.s. 8 (1964) 379 u.s. 8 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court yorty v. jordan, 379 u.s. 8 (1964) 379 u.s. 8 yorty et al. v. jordan, secretary of state of california. appeal from the supreme court of california. no. 250. decided october 12, 1964. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. roger arnebergh, bourke jones and james a. doherty for appellants. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, charles e. corker and charles a. barrett, assistant attorneys general, and sanford n. gruskin, deputy attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Full Judgment

BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE - 379 U.S. 8 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, 379 U.S. 8 (1964) 379 U.S. 8

BENNETT v. COUNTY OF DADE, FLORIDA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA.
No. 275, Misc.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 379 U.S. 8, 9


YORTY v. JORDAN, <a href="/100786"> 379 U.S. 8 </a> (1964) 379 U.S. 8 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court YORTY v. JORDAN, 379 U.S. 8 (1964) 379 U.S. 8

YORTY ET AL. v. JORDAN, SECRETARY OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 250.
Decided October 12, 1964.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Roger Arnebergh, Bourke Jones and James A. Doherty for appellants.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Charles E. Corker and Charles A. Barrett, Assistant Attorneys General, and Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial