Meyerkorth Vs. Nebraska

Meyerkorth vs Nebraska

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-15-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100653

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100653
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-15-1963
Case Number: 372 U.S. 705
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Meyerkorth

Respondent

Nebraska

Excerpt

meyerkorth v. nebraska - 372 u.s. 705 (1963) u.s. supreme court meyerkorth v. nebraska, 372 u.s. 705 (1963) 372 u.s. 705 meyerkorth et al. v. nebraska et al. appeal from the supreme court of nebraska. no. 827. decided april 15, 1963. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 173 neb. 889, 115 n. w. 2d 585. james n. ackerman for appellants. clarence a. h. meyer, attorney general of nebraska, and melvin k. kammerlohr, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. johnson v. dowd, 372 u.s. 705 (1963) 372 u.s. 705 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court johnson v. dowd, 372 u.s. 705 (1963) 372 u.s. 705 johnson v. dowd, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of indiana. no. 1, misc. decided april 15, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 241 ind. 702, 170 n. e. 2d 55. petitioner pro se. edwin k. steers, attorney general of indiana, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of lane v. brown, 372 u.s. 477 . page 372 u.s. 705, 706

Full Judgment

MEYERKORTH v. NEBRASKA - 372 U.S. 705 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court MEYERKORTH v. NEBRASKA, 372 U.S. 705 (1963) 372 U.S. 705

MEYERKORTH ET AL. v. NEBRASKA ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA.
No. 827.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 173 Neb. 889, 115 N. W. 2d 585.

James N. Ackerman for appellants.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

JOHNSON v. DOWD, <a href="/100653"> 372 U.S. 705 </a> (1963) 372 U.S. 705 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court JOHNSON v. DOWD, 372 U.S. 705 (1963) 372 U.S. 705

JOHNSON v. DOWD, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 1, Misc.
Decided April 15, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 241 Ind. 702, 170 N. E. 2d 55.

Petitioner pro se.

Edwin K. Steers, Attorney General of Indiana, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Brown, 372 U.S. 477 .

Page 372 U.S. 705, 706

Same Parties Meyerkorth vs Nebraska Same Subject Right to Information