Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

BaldwIn Vs. Moss

Baldwin vs Moss

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-10-1963
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100540

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
374 U.S. 93
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Baldwin

Respondent

Moss

Excerpt

baldwin v. moss - 374 u.s. 93 (1963) u.s. supreme court baldwin v. moss, 374 u.s. 93 (1963) 374 u.s. 93 baldwin et al. v. moss et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of oklahoma. no. 864. decided june 10, 1963. appeal dismissed. reported below: ___ f. supp. ___. walt allen, jim a. rinehart, leon s. hirsh and james c. harkin for appellants. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. mr. justice harlan would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits. allen v. virginia, 374 u.s. 93 (1963) allen et al. v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the circuit court of hopewell, virginia. no. 264, misc. decided june 10, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. leonard w. holt and simon lawrence cain for petitioners. sol goodman for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the circuit court of hopewell, virginia, for reconsideration in light of griffin v. illinois, 351 u.s. 12 . page 374 u.s. 93, 94

Full Judgment

BALDWIN v. MOSS - 374 U.S. 93 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court BALDWIN v. MOSS, 374 U.S. 93 (1963) 374 U.S. 93

BALDWIN ET AL. v. MOSS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 864.
Decided June 10, 1963.

Appeal dismissed.

Reported below: ___ F. Supp. ___.

Walt Allen, Jim A. Rinehart, Leon S. Hirsh and James C. Harkin for appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would postpone consideration of the question of jurisdiction until after argument on the merits.

ALLEN v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 93 (1963) ALLEN ET AL. v. VIRGINIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HOPEWELL, VIRGINIA. No. 264, Misc. Decided June 10, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Leonard W. Holt and Simon Lawrence Cain for petitioners.

Sol Goodman for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Circuit Court of Hopewell, Virginia, for reconsideration in light of Griffin v. Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 .

Page 374 U.S. 93, 94



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial