Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gray Vs. Pennsylvania

Gray vs Pennsylvania

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Oct-14-1963
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100485

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
375 U.S. 13
Subject
Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue
Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gray

Respondent

Pennsylvania

Excerpt

gray v. pennsylvania - 375 u.s. 13 (1963) u.s. supreme court gray v. pennsylvania, 375 u.s. 13 (1963) 375 u.s. 13 gray v. pennsylvania. appeal from the supreme court of pennsylvania. no. 383, misc. decided october 14, 1963. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 375 u.s. 13, 14 higbee v. thomas, 375 u.s. 13 (1963) 375 u.s. 13 (1963) "> u.s. supreme court higbee v. thomas, 375 u.s. 13 (1963) 375 u.s. 13 higbee v. thomas, warden. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of appeals of kentucky. no. 6, misc. decided october 14, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. john b. breckinridge, attorney general of kentucky, and ray corns, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeals of kentucky for further consideration in light of pennsylvania ex rel. herman v. claudy, 350 u.s. 116 . mr. justice clark, mr. justice harlan and mr. justice stewart are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.

Full Judgment

GRAY v. PENNSYLVANIA - 375 U.S. 13 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court GRAY v. PENNSYLVANIA, 375 U.S. 13 (1963) 375 U.S. 13

GRAY v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 383, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 375 U.S. 13, 14


HIGBEE v. THOMAS, <a href="/100485"> 375 U.S. 13 </a> (1963) 375 U.S. 13 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court HIGBEE v. THOMAS, 375 U.S. 13 (1963) 375 U.S. 13

HIGBEE v. THOMAS, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF KENTUCKY.
No. 6, Misc.
Decided October 14, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

John B. Breckinridge, Attorney General of Kentucky, and Ray Corns, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Kentucky for further consideration in light of Pennsylvania ex rel. Herman v. Claudy, 350 U.S. 116 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART are of the opinion that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial