Skip to content
How to use Download this judgment as PDF
  1. Log in with a plan that includes downloads.
  2. Click Download on the judgment page.
  3. Save the PDF to your device for offline reading or filing.

Lee Vs. Peek

Lee vs Peek

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Dec-03-1962
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100225
Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
371 U.S. 184

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Lee

Respondent

Peek

AI Legal Summary

Get an instant AI-powered legal breakdown - case summary, ratio decidendi, key issues, and more.

How to use Get a quick AI summary
  1. Open any judgment page.
  2. Click the AI Summary tab or button.
  3. Review facts, issues, and holding - verify against the full text before citing.

Excerpt

lee v. peek - 371 u.s. 184 (1962) u.s. supreme court lee v. peek, 371 u.s. 184 (1962) 371 u.s. 184 lee v. peek et al. appeal from the supreme court of south carolina. no. 426. decided december 3, 1962. appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. reported below: 240 s. c. 203, 125 s. e. 2d 353. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 371 u.s. 184, 185 pensick & gordon, inc., v. california motor express, 371 u.s. 184 (1962) 371 u.s. 184 (1962) "> u.s. supreme court pensick & gordon, inc., v. california motor express, 371 u.s. 184 (1962) 371 u.s. 184 pensick & gordon, inc., v. california motor express et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. no. 222. decided december 3, 1962. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 302 f.2d 391 . carl m. gould for petitioner. theodore w. russell, george l. catlin and joseph p. loeb for respondents. per

Full Judgment

LEE v. PEEK - 371 U.S. 184 (1962)
U.S. Supreme Court LEE v. PEEK, 371 U.S. 184 (1962) 371 U.S. 184

LEE v. PEEK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH CAROLINA.
No. 426.
Decided December 3, 1962.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Reported below: 240 S. C. 203, 125 S. E. 2d 353.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 371 U.S. 184, 185


PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS, <a href="/100225"> 371 U.S. 184 </a> (1962) 371 U.S. 184 (1962) "> U.S. Supreme Court PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS, 371 U.S. 184 (1962) 371 U.S. 184

PENSICK & GORDON, INC., v. CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 222.
Decided December 3, 1962.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 302 F.2d 391 .

Carl M. Gould for petitioner.

Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin and Joseph P. Loeb for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Hewitt-Robins Inc. v. Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante, p. 84.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, MR. JUSTICE STEWART, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in Hewitt-Robins.




Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial