LegalDraft-Template Search Results
Application For Permission Under S. 33 Of The Industrial Disputes Act (xiv Of 1947) Labour Act 1377
Category: Labour Act
Matched in: Form name Application for Permission under s. 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act (XIV of 1947)-Labour Act-1377.rtf
Notice Of Expulsion Of Partner Under Section 33, Indian Partnership Act, 1932
Category: Notice
Matched in: Form name Notice of expulsion of partner under section 33, Indian partnership act, 1932.pdf
500+ templates paired with judgment briefs
Form No. 22 [see Rule 33] Statement Of Tax Deducted At Source From Contribution Repaid To Employees In The Cas
Category: Incometaxold
Matched in: Form name FORM NO. 22 [See rule 33] Statement of tax deducted at source from contribution repaid to employees in the cas.pdf
Notice Of Acceptance Of The Offer 33
Category: Notices
Matched in: Form name Notice of acceptance of the Offer-33.rtf
Deed By Adoptive Father And Natural Guardian Deeds Adoption 1448
Category: Deeds Adoption
Natural Guardian Know all men by these presents that I AF, (being childless) son of B, residing at 33 Sham Sheth Street, Mumbai 400 002 and WF, wife of late GS, residing at 10 Kalvadevi Road, Mumbai
Counter Affidavit Under Order Xi Rule 13 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure 1908
Category: Affidavits Civil
Precedent No. 33 COUNTER-AFFIDAVIT: UNDER ORDER XI, RULE 13 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUBORDINATE JUDGE'S
Minutes Of The Proceedings Of The Statutory Meeting Companies Act 2015
Category: Companies Act
33 Minutes of the proceedings of the statutory meeting Minutes of the statutory meeting of the X Y
Evidence By Way Of Affidavit During Trial Under Sections 138 And 141 Of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 18811
Category: Affidavits Criminal
32 respectively and the Postal receipts for Registered post are Ex. CW1/5 to 12, 19 to 26 and 33 to 40 respectively for sending of three respective notices. 22. That, accused No. 2 is the signatory of
An Appeal Memo 1127
Category: Notices
32. That the Learned Lower Court has not taken into account the amendment carried into the original plaint. 33. That the Learned Lower Court ought to have held that the respondent had shifted into ownership premises only
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »
Try DraftPilot & AI Studio - 7 days free