Were [capitis' stimatio], a pecuniary compensation for any injury. See WITE....
Were continuing as such, the expression 'were continuing' is significant. This is in consonance with the object of the Act to ensure continuity of experience and service as one of the factors for regularising the appointment of the temporary lecturers, Dr. Sushma Sharma v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1985 SC 1367: (1985) 3 SCC 243: (1985) Supp SCR 45....
When, means 'as a simple relative', at which time, on which occasion; and then, sometimes implying suddenness, and just then, and at that moment, Madan Tiwari v. District Magistrate Rajnandgaon, 1975 Jab LJ 824: 1975 MP LJ 754....
When can or be read as and, depending upon the context, 'or' may be read as 'and' but the court would not do it unless it is so obliged because 'or' does not generally mean 'and' and 'and' does not generally mean 'or', R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay, AIR 1984 SC 684: (1984) 2 SCC 183: (1984) 2 SCR 495....
When the goods should have been delivered, the date when the goods should have been delivered for the purpose of the Third Clause of the 6th paragraph of Art. III of the Act is the date when the ship by which the goods were contracted to be carried has left the port at which delivery was to be made, East & West Steamship Co. Ltd. v. S.K. Ramalinga, AIR 1960 SC 1058 (1067). [Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925, Sch. Art. III para 6, Clause 3]...
When the suit is called for hearing, the expression 'when the suit is called for hearing' refers to the date which is stated in the summons issued to the defendant for appearing in the court, Jaspal Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi, AIR 1972 Del 230 (232), (Civil PC 1908, O. 9, R. 8)...
when-issued security see security ...
Which initiates any disciplinary proceedings, the words 'which initiates any disciplinary proceed-ings' in relation to the Govt. and words 'against whom such proceedings are started' in relation to a member of the Service indicate that the initiation of disciplinary proceedings in the form of inquiry into charges is not the prerequisite of an order of suspension, P.R. Nayak v. Union of India, AIR 1972 SC 554: (1972) 1 SCC 332: (1972) 2 SCR 695....
Which is entered into, the expression 'is entered into' is at the worst ambiguous and is capable of meaning either only those entered into after the date of the notification, or as meaning 'is or has been entered into' i.e., including a contract which having been entered into before is subsisting on that date, Raghubar Dayal Jai Parkash v. Union of India, AIR 1962 SC 263 (273): (1962) 3 SCR 547. [Forward Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1952 s. 15]...
Which ought to have been passed, the expression 'which ought to have been passed' means 'which ought in law to have been passed', Gini Ram v. Ramji Lal, AIR 1969 SC 1144 (1147). [Civil Procedure Code (1908), O. 41, R. 33]...