Were - Judgment Search Results
“The Petitioners Were Clerks. they Have Been Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-08-2013
CRM not M-16163 of 2012 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-16163 of 2012 (O&M) Date of decision:08. 08.2013. Kamaldeep and others ......Petitioners Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent...
Whose Applications Were Received Till 13.12.1991. Vs. Unknown
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.8670 of 2013 Date of decision:22. 7.2013 Mukesh .petitioner vs HPGCL and ors ..respondent Present Mr.Ravinder Hooda, Advocate. M.M.S.BEDI,J. The land of...
The Petitioners Were Initially Appointed on Adhoc Basis as Vs. Union o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-12-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.757-CAT of 2007 Date of Decision:12. 03.2014 Rajan Sood and others ..Petitioners Versus Union of India and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“learned Counsel Inter-alia Contended That there Were CertaIn Money ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-02-2013
CRM not M-5806 of 2013 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. not M-5806 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision:-2.3.2013 Narinderpal Kaur ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM:...
The Time of Survey Only Five a Class Buildings Were in Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-2013
CWP No.9613 of 2003. ::-1-:: IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9613 of 2003. [O&M].Date of Decision:20th August, 2013. Smt. Neelam Vashisht & ORS.Petitioners through Mr.Hitesh Kaplish, Advocate...
Service Though Back Wages Were Denied to them. Vs. the State of Haryan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Letters Patent Appeal No.836 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision : April 30, 2013 The State of Haryana and others .....Appellants versus Mohammad Farookh and another .....Respondents...
“The petitioner's grievance Is that though allotments were Vs. Satbi ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-25-2013
CWP No.1196 of 2013 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.1196 of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision :25. 7.2013 Satbir Singh and others ........Petitioners...
Standing there Who Were Holding Lathies and Dandas. He and Vs. State o ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
CRM No.17718 of 2013 in/and CRM-A No.172-MA of 2013 (O & M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CRM No.17718 of 2013 in/and CRM-A No.172-MA of 2013 (O & M)...
In Suresh Kumar's case (supra) were as follows:- Vs. State of Punjab a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.24557 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 3.10.2013. Lado Bai --Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others --Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA. Present:-...
Trial Court Records Were Also Requisitioned. on 18.07.2013 It Vs. Smt. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-22-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.M-68 of 2013 (O & M) Date of decision: 22.04.2014 Amit Kumar ....Appellant Versus Smt. Suman ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free