Will V United - Law Dictionary Search Results
As the case may be
situation may be, in other words in case there are separate and distinct units then concept of need will apply accordingly. Where, however, there is no such separate and distinct unit, it has no significance, Sobramaniam Sharmugham … As the case may be, expression 'as the case may be' is otherwise rendered superflous, Union of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2005) 8 SCC 760. --the words 'as the case may be' would only mean 'whichever the … may be, in other words in case there are separate and distinct units then concept of need will apply accordingly. Where, however, there is no
govern
: to serve as a precedent or deciding principle for [the law ing bills of lading] [United States v. Leon s the case at bar] gov·er·na·ble [gə-vər-nə-bəl] adj … 2 : to exert a determining or guiding influence in or over [the testator's assets are ed by will substitutes "W. M. McGovern, Jr. et al."] 3 : to serve as a precedent or deciding principle for
Salary or wages
payment, or promise of payment of a price; and (4) the passing of the title, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252: (1953) SCR 1059: (1953) SCJ 373: (1953) SCA 408: 55 BLJR … existence of goods, which form the subject-mater of this sale; (2) The bargain or contract which, when executed, will result in the passing of the property in the goods for a price, (3) the payment, or promise
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Aggression
with a very wide meaning and complex dimensions, its meaning cannot be explained by a strait-jacket formula but will depend on the fact situation of every case and its impact, Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India, (2005) … which may amount to aggression, Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India, (2005) 5 SCC 665; Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 US 581: 32 L ED 1068; Kawasaki v. Bantham SS. Co., (1938) 3 All ER 80
Consummation
uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word … of any words to limit the connotation of the word 'consumption' to the final act of consumption, it will be proper to think that the Constitution-makers used the word to connote any kind of user which is
Consumption and use
uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word … of any words to limit the connotation of the word 'consumption' to the final act of consumption, it will be proper to think that the Constitution-makers used the word to connote any kind of user which is
Volenti non fit injuria
& Son, (1935) 1 KB 146; contra if the risk was undertaken voluntarily and not under duty, Cutler v. United Dairies (London) Ltd., (1933) 2 KB 297; and see Rescue and Voluntary Assumption of Risk, by Professor Goodhart, … Volenti non fit injuria. Plow. 501.-(Where the sufferer is willing no injury is done.) See this maxim criticized by Lord Esher in Yarmouth v. France, (1887) 19 QBD
Judgment
to allow the amendment, a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Prasant Chandra Sen v. United Commercial Bank, AIR 1982 Cal 555. An end to the suit or proceeding, the adjudication is indisputably a … liability. The right or liability is to be found out by the Court. The nature of the order will have to be examined in order to ascertation whether there has been a determination of any right or
Likely
Likely, means no more than 'may well', Dunning v. United Liverpool Hospital' Board of Governors, (1973) 1 WLR 586. Means 'a real prospect of success, Bonnard v. Perryman, … The word 'bodily injury ........................ sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death' mean that death will be the 'most probable' result of the injury, having regard to the ordinary course of nature, Ruli Ram
McNabb-Mallory rule
McNabb-Mallory rule [after McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957), U.S. Supreme Court cases … Under the U.S. Code, a delay of more than six hours in bringing an arrestee before a magistrate will not render a confession inadmissible if the delay was reasonable in light of distance and transportation.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free