Skip to content

Did you mean: states v wrong?

States V Wong - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Judgment

court is concerned is a judgment within the meaning of s 494 of the criminal procedure code 1898 state of bihar v ram naresh pandey air 1957 sc 389 1957 scr 279 s 494 of cr pc

May

section 6 of the act a meaning other than its ordinary meaning and to interpret it as shall state v surajdeo sinha 1953 bljr 571 1954 cr lj 139 1954 pat 80 the word may does not

Public servant

a muni cipality is a public servant within the meaning of the s 2 maharudrappa danappa kesarappanavar v state of mysore air 1961 sc 785 1962 1 scr 129 ii the minister is a public servant in

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Trial

the plaintiff and if it appear that the burden of proof is on the plaintiff his senior counsel states the case to the jury after which the witnesses for the plaintiff are examined by his counsel the … trial does not exclude a proceeding relating to the delivery of judgment inayat v rex air 1950 all 369 1950 all lj 127 1950 all wr 245 trial is not necessary that

Shop

than 7 p m may be fixed by the local authority with the sanction of a secretary of state s 5 the act contains special provisions with reference to trading elsewhere than in shops s 9 to … on right employment has special provisions as to the catering trade the sale of accessories for aircraft motor vehicles and cycles provides for weekly half holidays and intervals for meals and provides for sanitary and other arrangements

Interlocutory order

the basis for insertion of this particular provision in s 397 of the 1973 code amar nath v state of haryana air 1977 sc 2185 2189 1977 4 scc 137 1978 1 scr 222 criminal pc 1974

Public Order Act, 1936

could have access to it but it is one to which members of public in fact have resort state of kerala v cherian secarich air 1967 ker 106 1967 ilr 1 ker 24 1966 lt 780 1966

Maintenance

the object that the article would be readily and easily available to the consumer mahendrakumar bhagwandas rendheria v state air 1967 bom 163 it includes in all cases provision for food clothing residence education and medical attendance

Obscene

in the compromise between candor and shame at which the community may have arrived here and now united states v kennerley 209 f 119 121 s d n y 1913 obscene the indian penal code borrowed the word

Pending

the answer is that until the case is concluded it is pending lt col s k kashyap v state of rajasthan air 1971 sc 1120 1128 1971 2 scc 126 1971 3 scr 881 army act 1950

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial