State V Rayburn - Law Dictionary Search Results
Judgment
pc 1898 s 367 an interlocutory order under s 18 of the high court ordinance not a judgment state v hindo open sugar mills air 1974 raj 110 the term judgment in the letters patent of the high
May
section 6 of the act a meaning other than its ordinary meaning and to interpret it as shall state v surajdeo sinha 1953 bljr 571 1954 cr lj 139 1954 pat 80 the word may does not always
Public servant
because he has required to undergo training and to be called up for service as and when required state v air commodore kailash chand air 1980 sc 522 1980 1 scc 667 1980 2 scr 697 vii a
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Trial
a cause by a judicial tribunal determination of guilt of innocence of an accused person by a court state v haridas mundhara 1974 cal wn 929 means the proceedings which commences when the case is called on with
Shop
and establishments act 1948 s 2 27 shop an agency is neither a shop nor a commercial establishment state v brijlal gulati air 1961 all 79 shop is a place where services are sold on retail basis employees
Interlocutory order
definitive made or done during the progress of an action webster s third new international dictionary see also state v n m t joy immaculate 2004 5 scc p 729 means pronounced and arising during legal procedure not
Public Order Act, 1936
public or not even though there may be certain conditions attached to the entry or the use thereof state v dohana jamnadas air 1961 guj 182 means a place to which persons are in the habit of resorting
Maintenance
of suitable rooms must surely include where there are no such rooms their construction and then their maintenance state v kunja behari chandra air 1954 pat 371 means to preserve or to keep in good condition jiya lal
Obscene
in the compromise between candor and shame at which the community may have arrived here and now united states v kennerley 209 f 119 121 s d n y 1913 obscene the indian penal code borrowed the
Pending
waiting state of maharashtra v chandrasekhara 1959 mah lj 607 means not yet decided in continuance in suspense state v haridas mundhra 1973 74 78 cal wn 929
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free