Sharma V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Property
to enjoy, the right to destroy, the right to retain, the right to alienable and so on, Gurudutta Sharma v. State of Bihar, 1962 (2) SCC 292: 1962 (1) SCJ 382: AIR 1961 SC 1684. Property, may denote the … enjoy, the right to destroy, the right to retain, the right to alienate and so on, Guru Datta Sharma v. State of Bihar, AIR 1961 SC 1684 (1697): (1962) 2 SCR 292. (vii) The word 'property' is used in
Organised crime
any other person or promoting insurgency. [Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, s. 2(e)] --See Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsingh Sharma v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2005 SC 2277. Any continuing unlawful activity by an individual, singly or jointly, either as … or gaining undue economic or other advantage for himself or any other person or promoting insurgency, Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 2005 SC 2277. [See Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, (30 of 1999), s. 2(1)(e)]
Adequate and special reasons
What is adequate and special would depend upon several factors and no straitjacket formula can be imposed, Bhupinder Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2003) 8 SCC 551 (558). (Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 376) --the expression 'adequate and … What is adequate and special would depend upon several factors and no straitjacket formula can be imposed, Bhupinder Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (2003) 8 SCC 551.
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Proceeding
Sharma, AIR 1980 Cal 328; Babu A. v. Bhaskar Shetty, 1982 (2) Kant LJ 43; P.L. Kantha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1995 (29) ATC 301 (SC): 1995 (2) SCC 471: AIR 1995 SCW 590: AIR 1995
Acquisition
property and as this had been taken over it constituted an acquisition within the constitutional provision, Guru Datta Sharma v. State of Bihar, AIR 1961 SC 1684 (1695): 1962 (2) SCR 292. The expression 'acquisition' in the definition means
Habitually
4 SCC 126. [Also see The Law Lexicon (2nd Edn.), P. Ramanatha Aiyar] Connotes same act of continuity, Sharma Prashant Raje v. Ganpatrao, (2000) 7 SCC 522. The expression 'habitually' would obviously mean repeatedly or persistently, Amanulla … propensity, that is, present from day-to-day, Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, Fourth Edn., Vol. 2, p. 1204, Vijay Narain Singh v. State of Bihar, AIR 1984 SC 1334 (1338): (1984) 3 SCC 14: (1984) 3 SCR 435. Means 'usually' and
Ordinarily
Ordinarily, may means 'normally', State of Andhra Pradesh v. V. Sharma Rao, AIR 2007 SC 137; Kailash Chandra v. Union of India, (1962) 1 SCR 374: AIR 1961 SC
Repugnancy
when both the statutes covering the same field are applied to a given set of facts, Vijay Kumar Sharma v. State of Karnataka, (1990) 2 SCC 562 (602): AIR 1990 SC 2072. See also AIR 1959 SC 648 (665).
Mutatis mutandis
Mutatis mutandis, implies applicability of any provision with necessary changes in points of detail, Prahlad Sharma v. State of U.P., (2004) 4 SCC 113. Mutatis mutandis, means 'with the necessary changes in points of detail, Earl
Sentence
lead to confusion, inconsistency and contradiction and in practical terms cause inordinate delay and practical inconvenience, Dilip Kumar Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1976 SC 133 (138): (1976) 1 SCC 560: (1976) 2 SCR 289. The Judgment
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free