Did you mean: see rahim but v abdul?
See Rahim Bux V Abdul - Law Dictionary Search Results
Unmarried
unmarried daughters under the hindu law have got better claims on the stridhana of the mother rajban v rahim bux 1969 ilr 1 all 633 1969 all lj 16 1969 all wr hc 78
Jari
taken into consideration for the purposes of either adding to or subtracting from its terms secretary of state v abdul rahim air 1928 mad 1246
Purporting to act
statutory duty but also based on omission to perform a statutory duty commissioners for the port of calcutta v abdul rahim oosman co 1964 68 cal wn 814
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Marz-ool-maut
which would be the inability to attend to ordinary avocations rashid karmalli v sherbanoo 31 bom 264 cgt v abdul karim air 1991 sc 1847 1852 1991 3 scc 520
Salami
a free gift made by way of compliment or in return for a favour legal remembrancer west bengal v abdul wadud 1951 ilr 1 cal 547 salami is something quite different from rent the two things are two
Shall
no control over the performance of the duty such provision should be treated as directory one sharifud din v abdul gani lone air 1980 sc 303 1980 1 scc 403 1980 1 scr 1177 xi ordinarily the use … the future in pursuance to the documents this is a draftsman practice he will find that his language seems to be less ambersome and clumsy and is easier to follow he may also avoid positive errors such
Betel leaves
climbing plant which is chewed and used as a stimulant oxford dictionary betel leaves are not vegetables ram bux v state of rajasthan air 1963 sc 351 352 rajasthan sales tax act 1954 sch 2 item 2
Reasonable requirement
to make it impossible or extremely difficult for the landlord to get a decree for eviction bega begum v abdul ahad khan air 1979 sc 272 276 j k houses and shops rent control act 34 of 1966
Requirement
requirement connotes that there should be an element of need bega begum v abdul ahad khan air 1979 sc 272 requirement coupled with the word reasonable means that it must be something
Short shrift
lack of adequate judicial attention the tribunal made short shrift of the workmen s plea mumbai kamghar sabha v abdul bhai air 1977 sc 1455 1457 para 5 justice v r krishna iyer
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free