Skip to content

S 37 - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Wholly and exclusively

to refer at this stage to the legislative history of s. 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which corresponds to s. … of the expenditure as a condition for claiming deduction under s. 37. S. 37(1) in the Bill read 'any expenditure . .

Directors

in an amended form by the (English) Companies Act, 1929, s. 37 (see DECEIT), was passed in consequence of the decision of … and of the grounds for any withdrawal of consent, see s. 37(1)(iii), and to meet the case of statements made on the

Judicial proceeding

Sastri, AIR 1954 SC 545 (553). [Income Tax Act, 1992, s. 37] Judicial proceedings, under the provisions of s. 37 of the … Act, 1992, s. 37] Judicial proceedings, under the provisions of s. 37 of the Indian Income-tax Act the proceedings before the Income-tax

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Settled land

an order of the Court [(English) Settled Land Act, 1882, s. 37], and see now (English) S.L. Act, 1925, s. 67.

Sessions of the peace

or admitted the offence [(English) Criminal Justice Administration Act, 1914, s. 37 (1)]; and under the Criminal Justice Act, 1925, s. 25, … make an order) under the enactments relating to bastardy [ib., s. 37 (2)]. There is also a right to appeal under the

University

Scottish Universities qualified under 31 & 32 Vict. c. 48, s. 37, are entitled to be registered as parliamentary electors for a

Person aggrieved

1 SCC 484: (1971) 1 SCR 863. [Advocates Act, 1961, s. 37] (ii) The word 'person' will embrace the Bar Council which

Fees

(English) Solicitors Act, 1843 (6 & 7 Vict. c. 73), s. 37, replaced by (English) Solicitors Act, 1932 (c. 37), s. 64.

Deceit

14 App Cas 337]. Under the (English) Companies Act, 1929, s. 37, a special action for deceit will lie at the instance … these cases there is a statutory right of contribution, see s. 37(3), from which (apparently) guilty promotes have been excluded. See also

Dispossession

of s. 36(1) and (2) of the 1993 Act; that s. 37(4) could only validate a disposition to which s. 36(1) or

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace — 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial