Did you mean: raj v the?
Rao V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Building
hotel or boarding house. A.P. Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960, Nandan Mahamma v. Markonda Narasimha Rao, AIR 2006 AP 8. The word 'building' has not been defined in the U.P. Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951
Persona designata
a question will arise whether the intention was to single him out as a persona designata, Ram Chandra Rao v. State of Madras, AIR 1962 AP 58. Persona designata, is a person selected to act in his private … a particular character, Maharaja Dharmendra Prasad Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1969 All 484; Ram Chandra Rao v. State of Madras, AIR 1962 AP 58; Ram Milan v. Bansi Lal, AIR 1958 MP 203 (FB); G.N.
Proceeding
The word 'proceeding' though has not been defined under s. 29, it is a comprehensive term, P.L. Kantha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1995 SC 807: (1995) 2 SCC 471. [Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, s. 29] … Lal Sharma, AIR 1980 Cal 328; Babu A. v. Bhaskar Shetty, 1982 (2) Kant LJ 43; P.L. Kantha Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1995 (29) ATC 301 (SC): 1995 (2) SCC 471: AIR 1995 SCW 590: AIR
Keep your definitions linked to case research
May
Kamar Singh v. Delhi Administration, 1965 SC 971; Banwari Lal v. State of Bihar, 1961 SC 849; Narayana Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 1957 SC 737. [See also Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 39] The word 'may'
Ordinarily
Ordinarily, may means 'normally', State of Andhra Pradesh v. V. Sharma Rao, AIR 2007 SC 137; Kailash Chandra v. Union of India, (1962) 1 SCR 374: AIR 1961 SC 1346;
Proof
must mean such evidence as would induce a reasonable man to come to a particular conclusion', M. Narsinga Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2001 SC 318: (2001) 1 SCC 691. Proof does not mean proof to
Fraud on a power
Satyam Febres (India) Pvt. Ltd., (1996) 5 SCC 550. See also State of Andhra Pradesh v. T. Suryachandra Rao, AIR 2005 SC 3110. As is well-known vitiates every solemn act. Fraud and justice never dwell together. Fraud
Quo warranto
with the connivance of the Executive or by reason of its apathy, University of Mysore v. C.D. Govinda Rao, AIR 1965 SC 491: (1964) 4 SCR 575. (Constitution of India, Art. 226) Quo warranto, proceeding affords a
Charge
than one. [Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), s. 2 (b)] Means expenditure, H.H. Maharajadhiraja Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia Bahadur of Gwalior v. Union of India, (1971) 1 SCC 85: AIR 1971 SC 530:
Prathista
Prathista, means consecration, Rama Rao v. Venkata Ratnam, AIR 1947 PC 88: 230 IC 438: 1947 All LJ 365: 1947 All WR (PC) 25: … inhabited; also, purification or re-consecration of an idol, house, or temple that has been polluted, Kapalavayi Kasi Raa Rao v. Kotta Venkataratnam, AIR 1947 PC 88.
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free