Skip to content

Did you mean: raj v kameswar?

Rao V Kameswar - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Persona designata

a question will arise whether the intention was to single him out as a persona designata ram chandra rao v state of madras air 1962 ap 58 persona designata is a person selected to act in his private

Proceeding

sharma air 1980 cal 328 babu a v bhaskar shetty 1982 2 kant lj 43 p l kantha rao v state of andhra pradesh 1995 29 atc 301 sc 1995 2 scc 471 air 1995 scw 590 air

May

kamar singh v delhi administration 1965 sc 971 banwari lal v state of bihar 1961 sc 849 narayana rao v state of andhra pradesh 1957 sc 737 see also civil procedure code 1908 s 39 the word may

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Proof

must mean such evidence as would induce a reasonable man to come to a particular conclusion m narsinga rao v state of andhra pradesh air 2001 sc 318 2001 1 scc 691 proof does not mean proof to

In the course of trade or business

existed before the offending contract could be said to be in the course of business c v k rao v dantu bhaskara rao air 1965 sc 93 1964 8 scr 152

Prathista

prathista means consecration rama rao v venkata ratnam air 1947 pc 88 230 ic 438 1947 all lj 365 1947 all wr pc 25

Teacher

teacher includes a physical director p s ramamohan rao v andhra pradesh agricultural university 1977 supreme today 93 1997 8 scc 350 means a principal professor assistant professor

Judgment

is meant an order in a trial terminating in the conviction or acquittal of the accused thikka surya rao v sirangu sathiraju air 1948 mad 510 the word judgment is not defined in the code in halsbury s

Maintenance

devaraja shetty air 1926 mad 723 the maintenance of the detenue and not of his dependants moturu hanumantha rao v government of andhra pradesh air 1966 ap 229 233 defence of india rules 1962 r 40 maintenance does

Court

court for the purposes of ss 2 and 3 of the contempt of courts act 1971 k sham rao v assistant charity commissioner 2003 3 scc 563 2003 cri lj 1575 air 2003 sc 1828 1831 contempt of

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial