Skip to content

Peck Co V Lowe - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Corporation

1908 s 20 expl ii has no right under art 19 of the constitution of india tata engineering co v state of bihar air 1965 sc 40 has a legal entity separate from that of its holders chiranji

Goods

scc 200 state of andhra pradesh v national thermal power corpn ltd 2002 5 scc 203 mckinley telephone co v cumberland telephone co 152 wis 359 140 nw 38 1913 wisc lexis 77 means chery kind of movable

Partition

for an order for partition of a wall separating the gardens of two adjoining houses see mayfair property co v johnson 1894 1 ch 508 by the english partition act 1868 now repealed it was provided s 3

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Precedent

equality of votes in the negative and nothing but an act of parliament will remove them london tramways co v london county council 1898 ac 75 the deci sions of a judge at nisi prius are not considered

Interest

to have effect for the law on these repealed ss 28 and 29 see l c d ry co v s e ry co 1892 1 ch p 146 re edwards 1891 61 lj ch 22 and london

Copyright

posthumous works s 17 government publications s 18 mechanical contrivances for reproducing sounds s 19 and see chappell co v columbia gramophone co 1914 1 kb 395 political speeches s 20 and see walter v lane 1900 ac

Trial

that has proper jurisdiction black s law dictionary 7th edn p 1348 see also c s f rly co v smit okl 270 p 2d 629 633 pulaski v state 23 wis 2d 138 126 n w 2d

Ultra vires

an ordinary person can do wenlock baroness v river dee co 1885 10 ac 354 british south africa co v de beers consolidated mines ltd 1910 1 ch 354 subject to the consequences if the act is prohibited

Penalty

penalty is a liability under the taxing statute khemka co v state of maharashtra air 1975 sc 1549 penalty is legal or official punishment such as a term of

Judgment

the appeal on any ground therefore the order in question is not a judgment chalavada venkata subbarao and co v grandhi sree amulu air 1965 ap 16 in order to constitute a judgment within the ambit of clause

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial