Skip to content

Manvendra Singh V Jeevendra - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Malice

another. In its legal sense it means a wrongful act, done intentionally without just cause or excuse, Bhagat Singh v. Emperor, AIR 1930 Lah 266. Malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a

Precedent

in the conduct of their affairs, as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules, Surinder Singh v. Hardial Singh, AIR 1985 SC (1985) 1 SCC 91: (1985) 1 SCR 1059.

Actus curiae neminem gravabit.

the Court he should be restored to the position he would have occupied but for that mistake, Jang Singh v. Brij Lal, (1964) 2 SCR 145, (para 16); See Also CIT v. B. N. Bhattacharjee, (1979) 4 SCC

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Confession

not make a statement which would incriminate him unless urged by the promptings of truth and conscience, Sahib Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997) 7 SCC 231: AIR 1997 SC 3247 (3254). [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention), Act,

May

Pradesh v. Jogendra Singh, 1963 SC 1613; State of Uttar Pradesh v. Manbodan Lal, 1957 SC 912; Kamar Singh v. Delhi Administration, 1965 SC 971; Banwari Lal v. State of Bihar, 1961 SC 849; Narayana Rao v. State

Reason to believe

of the officer. The belief must be held in good faith; it cannot merely be a pretence, Partap Singh v. Director of Enforcement, AIR 1985 SC 989: (1985) 3 SCC 72. Means that reasons should exist but the

Terrorism

hurt by the violence and those affected by the fear) as well as in the practitioners, Devender Pal Singh v. State NCT of Delhi, AIR 2002 SC 1661 (1665): (2002) 5 SCC 234. [Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention)

Cause of action

to denote the whole bundle of material facts which a plaintiff must prove in order to succeed, Gurdit Singh v. Munsha Singh, (1977) 2 SCR 250: AIR 1977 SC 640 (654): (1977) 1 SCC 791. (Punjab Limitation (Customs)

Judgment

the right, recognises the commission of the injury, or negatives the allegation of one or the other, Gurdit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 1791 (1794): (1974) 2 SCC 260: (1974) 3 SCR 896. In finding

Person

Anandrao v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1995 Bom 206. Person, refers to human being a self-conscious personality, Badri Singh v. State of Bihar, (1996) 1 BLJ 31. Person, shall include any company or association or body of individuals,

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial