Skip to content

Magone V King - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Judgment

anderson 1889 p 576 is a decision finally determining the right of the parties in the proceeding kuppusswami v king air 1949 fc 1 is a judgment must be a decision pronounced by a court in cause which

Cause of action

the existence of which entitles one person to obtain from the court a remedy against another person herb v king fahd bin abdul aziz 2006 1 wlr 578 ca means the cause of action for which the suit

Bailment

1876 1 cpd 423 and for an explanation of the duty of private bailees of this class brabant v king 1895 ac 632 as to the liability of a bailee for the acts of his servants see cheshire

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Costs

see r v archbishop of canterbury 1902 2 kb 571 thomas v pritchard 1903 1 kb 212 johnson v king 1904 ac 824 rwland v air council 1923 wn 72 re carbonit 1923 wn 208 several acts english

Licence

see hurst v picture theatres 1915 1 kb 1 and the authorities there referred to and allen sons v king 1916 2 ac 54 it may be either written or verbal when written the paper containing the authority

False pretence, obtaining property

trick can pass no such title heap v motor advisory agency ltd 1922 1 kb 282 583 folkes v king 1922 1 kb the distinction is that in false pretences the owner intends to divest himself of the

Autrefois acquit

been sufficient to procure a legal conviction upon the first r v emden 1808 9 east 437 r v king 1897 1 qb 214 explained and distinguished in rex v barron 1914 s kb 570 criminal procedure act

Brawling

a penalty of not more than 5l or imprisonment for any term not exceeding two months see matthews v king 1934 1 kb 505 to object to a deacon presenting himself for ordination as priest that he has

Delivery order

delivery order which is fradulent see union credit bank v mersey docks 1899 2 qb 205 farquharson bros v king 1902 ac 325

Replevin

the goods though indeed they may be replevied at any time before they have been sold see jacob v king 1814 5 taunt 451 an action for replevin may be commenced in the high court and if the

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial