Skip to content

M V Jayarajan - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Person aggrieved

it represents the collective conscience of the standards of professional conduct and etiquette bar council of maharashtra v m v dabholkar air 1975 sc 2092 1975 2 scc 702 advocates act 1961 ss 37 28 iii in the

Public servant

avowed object of stamping out corruption at various levels prevailing in the country state of madhya pradesh v m v narasimhan air 1975 sc 1835 1975 2 scc 377 1976 1 scr 6 iv for the purposes of

Maritime lien

ship although a maritime claim would not be liable to be classified as maritime lien epoch entercpots v m v won fu air 2003 sc 24 29 2003 1 scc 305 there are two attributes to maritime lien

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Cause of action

any misrepresentation fraud breach of trust wilful default or undue influence liverpool london s p i assocn v m v sea success 2004 9 scc 512 562 civil procedure code 1908 o 7 r 11 9 it is

Shall

if the intention is otherwise it may be construed to be merely directory owners and parties interested in m v vali pero v fernandeo lopez air 1989 sc 2206 1989 4 scc 671 1989 supp 1 scr 187

Butter

butter includes butter prepared from curd m v joshi v m u shimpi 1961 3 scr 986 air 1961 sc 1494 prevention of food adueteration rules

Post-graduate research or specialist qualification

looked upon as a post graduate research or specialist qualification counsel of scientific industrial research new delhi v m v sastry 1997 7 scc 494

Damage

the english courts as not to apply to claims against the carrying ship for damage done to cargo m v elisabeth v harwan investment and trading p ltd 1993 supp 2 scc 433 air 1993 sc 1014 1038

Subject to

224 means under the condition that we accept subject to her agreement collin s english dictionary see also m v shankar bhat v claude pinto air 2004 sc 636 means in case of a contract if it is

Material facts

claimed in plaint or defendant s defence in written statement mayar h k ltd v owner parties vessel m v forture express 2006 air sc 1828 2006 3 scc 100 2006 2 jt 48 2006 2 scale 30

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial