In Man Singh V Mothi - Law Dictionary Search Results
Qabiz darmiani
mean an under proprietor in the sense in which it is used in the oudh rent acts kunwar man singh v bindeshwari bakshi singh air 1937 oudh 473 190 ia 595 oudh rent act 1869
Malice
another in its legal sense it means a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause or excuse bhagat singh v emperor air 1930 lah 266 malice has been said to mean any wrong or indirect motive but a … intention which must necessarily precede the act intended see archbold crim pleading and practice sub tit homicide and manslaughter in the law of defamation the defence that the occasion was privileged i e one of qualified privilege
Precedent
in the conduct of their affairs as well as a basis for orderly development of legal rules surinder singh v hardial singh air 1985 sc 1985 1 scc 91 1985 1 scr 1059 … question before a court has been decided is alone binding as a precedent uttaranchal road transport corporation v mansaram nainwal 2000 6 scc 366 a precedent acquirers added authority from lapse of time the longer a precedent
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
the court he should be restored to the position he would have occupied but for that mistake jang singh v brij lal 1964 2 scr 145 para 16 see also cit v b n bhattacharjee 1979 4 scc … 2 scc 128 air 1991 sc 373 hanuman vitamin foods p ltd v cce 1998 8 scc 336 mansukhlal vithaldas chauhan v state of gujarat 1997 7 sc 622 air 1997 sc 3400 west bengal essential commodities
Confession
not make a statement which would incriminate him unless urged by the promptings of truth and conscience sahib singh v state of haryana 1997 7 scc 231 air 1997 sc 3247 3254 terrorist and disruptive activities prevention act
May
of its functions state of uttar pradesh v jogendra singh 1963 sc 1613 state of uttar pradesh v manbodan lal 1957 sc 912 kamar singh v delhi administration 1965 sc 971 banwari lal v state of bihar … pradesh v jogendra singh 1963 sc 1613 state of uttar pradesh v manbodan lal 1957 sc 912 kamar singh v delhi administration 1965 sc 971 banwari lal v state of bihar 1961 sc 849 narayana rao v state
Reason to believe
of the officer the belief must be held in good faith it cannot merely be a pretence partap singh v director of enforcement air 1985 sc 989 1985 3 scc 72 means that reasons should exist but the … 72 means that reasons should exist but the court will not go into the adequacy of such reason manchand co v cit west bengal air 1969 cal 431 means coming to the conclusion on the basis of
Terrorism
hurt by the violence and those affected by the fear as well as in the practitioners devender pal singh v state nct of delhi air 2002 sc 1661 1665 2002 5 scc 234 terrorist and disruptive activities prevention … 5 scc 234 terrorist and disruptive activities prevention act 1987 s 2 h terrorism is one of the manifestations of increased lawlessness and cult of violence violence and crime constitute a threat to an established order and
Cause of action
to denote the whole bundle of material facts which a plaintiff must prove in order to succeed gurdit singh v munsha singh 1977 2 scr 250 air 1977 sc 640 654 1977 1 scc 791 punjab limitation customs
Judgment
the right recognises the commission of the injury or negatives the allegation of one or the other gurdit singh v state of punjab air 1974 sc 1791 1794 1974 2 scc 260 1974 3 scr 896 in finding … the action see inquiry summonses and orders and the various titles of the subjects of such judgments as mandamus injunc tion etc b final putting an end to the action by an award of redress to one
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free