Skip to content

Harris V Reeves - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Dependants of ex-serviceman

to the law in that part of her majesty s dominions in which the maintenance order was made harris v harris 1949 2 all er 318

Oppression

oppression the trampling upon or bearing down a person under pretence of law see also harris v harris ltd 1936 sc 183 court of sess taking the dictionary meaning of the word oppression viscount simonds

Assignment

v price 1924 40 tlr 589 assignments of leases and terms of years must be by deed see harris v goodwyn 1841 9 dowl 409 and the law of property act 1925 s 52 replacing the statute of

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Weights and measures

shall be liable to be forfeited s 25 applies to a vendor s churn conveying milk by rail harris v london county council 1895 1 qb 240 but not to post office scales reg v justices of kent

Profit a prendre

a profit a prendre in alieno solo without stint and for commercial purposes is unknown to the law harris v chesterfield earl 1911 ac 623 as to a demise of a profit a prendre see radcliff v hayes

Wager

money to him on the event not happening and see the elaborate definition of wagering contract in carlill v carbolic smoke ball co 1892 2 qb 490 by hawkins j 1 money or other consideration risked on … discharge of bets lost by b to other persons cannot be recovered by a from b tatam v reeve 1893 1 qb 44 the consideration for a cheque given or in repayment of a loan made for

Betting

statute gets rid of the decision in real v anderson 1884 13 qbd 779 and see tatam v reeve 1893 1 qb 44 and de mattos v benjamin 1894 70 lt 560 in the case of a … betting for definition and for s 18 of the english gaming act 1845 8 9 vict c 109 see wager bets are irrecoverable at law by virtue of s 18 of the english gaming

Receiver

fa elegit or other ordinary process of execution as to the appoint ment of such a receiver see harris v beauchamp bros 1894 1 qb 801 morgan v hart 1914 2 kb 183 r s c 1883 ord

Que estate

profit a prendre in alieno solo without stint and for commercial pur poses is unknown to the law harris v chesterfield earl 1911 ac 623 see prescription

High Commission Court

directed to tyrannical and unconstitutional pur poses it was therefore abolished by 16 car 1 c 11 5 reeves 215 … high commission court established by 1 eliz c 1 it was instituted to vindicate the dignity and peace of the church by reforming and correcting the ecclesiastical state and persons and all

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial