Skip to content

Gill V The - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Cause of action

the plaintiff to prove in order to support his right to a judgment of the Court, Cooke v. Gill, 1873 LR CP 107: 42 LJ CP 98. In other words, a bundle of facts which it is

Election

calling upon the electorate to elect and culminating in the final declaration of the returned candidate, Mohinder Singh Gill v. Chief Election Commissioner, (1978) 1 SCC 405: AIR 1978 SC 851: (1978) 2 SCR 272. Preparation and revision

Recruitment

lead to an appointment. Recruitment and appointment are, thus, two separate concepts and are not synonymous, Gurdev Singh Gill v. State of Punjab, 1968 Sind LR 538: 1969 ILR 1 Punj 231. Recruitment, is only for making up

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Injunction

a proper case damages may be awarded either in addition to or in substitution for an injunction [see Gilling v. Gray, (1910) 27 TLR 39]. As to the recovery of damages in lieu of an injunction for

Modesty

the dignity of the lady ' 'sexual overtones' or not, notwithstanding, Reopan Deol Bajai v. Kanwar Pal Singh Gill, (1995) 6 SCC 194: AIR 1996 SC 309 (313). (Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 354) Modesty, is defined

Natural justice

than a decision in a quasi-judicial enquiry. In the language of V.R. Krishna Iyer, J. [vide Mohinder Singh Gill case, AIR 1978 SC 851: (1978) 2 SCR 272: (1978 (1) SCC 405]: '... subject to certain necessary

Workman

from his relationship as an industrial workman with his employer, National Buildings Construction Corporation Ltd. v. Pritam Singh Gill, AIR 1972 SC 1579: (1972) 2 SCC 1: (1973) 1 SCR 40. Cart driver engaged by Area Manager

Reception

Reception, implies 'refuse to reject', S. Raghbir Singh Gill v. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra, (2003) 5 SCC 647.

Refusal

Refusal, implies 'refuse to accept', S. Raghbir Singh Gill v. S. Gurcharan Singh Tohra, (2003) 5 SCC 647. Refusal, where one has, by law, a right and power

Material facts and material particulars

where his election is challenged on the ground of any corrupt practice, Roop Lal Sathi v. Nachhattar Singh Gill, AIR 1982 SC 1559: (1982) 3 SCC 487: (1983) 1 SCR 702. (Representation of the People Act, 1951,

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial