David Greene V United - Law Dictionary Search Results
Apprentice
see learoyd v brooks 1891 1 qb 431 an infant can bind himself by a deed of apprenticeship green v thompson 1899 2 qb 1 with regard to apprentices for the mercantile marine see the english merchant
Commission Agent or Broker
commission commission may be earned by bringing contracting parties together although an actual contract may not be made green v bartlett 1863 32 ljcp 261 from a contract to employ for a time certain on commission may
Infant
binding ab initio and need on ratification such as contracts for the public service articles of apprenticeship see green v thompson 1899 2 qb 1 executed contracts of marriage representative acts as executor or trustee contracts for
Keep your definitions linked to case research
prior restraint
by publication before the expression actually takes place see also near v minnesota and new york times co v united states in the important cases section compare censorship freedom of speech note in new york times co v
Judgment
to allow the amendment a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the letters patent prasant chandra sen v united commercial bank air 1982 cal 555 an end to the suit or proceeding the adjudication is indisputably a
New trial
for a new trial runs from the verdict of the jury and not from the giving of judgment greene v croome 1908 1 kb 277 the motion must be made to the court of appeal see ord xxxix
McNabb-Mallory rule
mcnabb mallory rule after mcnabb v united states 318 u s 332 1943 and mallory v united states 354 u s 449 1957 u s
McNabb-Mallory rule
broader protections afforded under the mioranda rule the mcnabb mallory rule is rarely applied in modern cases mcnabb v united states 318 us 332 63 s ct 608 1943 mallory v united states 354 us 449 77 s
Salary or wages
payment or promise of payment of a price and 4 the passing of the title state of bombay v united motors india ltd air 1953 sc 252 1953 scr 1059 1953 scj 373 1953 sca 408 55 bljr
Solicitor
act 1934 24 25 geo 5 c 45 passed as a result of the decision in law society v united services bureau 1934 1 kb 343 which decided that person in the 1932 act meant natural person so
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free