Did you mean: cow?
Cox - Law Dictionary Search Results
Cox
Matched in: Term Cox
Coverture
[see Reg. v. Manning, (1849) 2 C&K 903]; but the presumption maybe rebutted [Reg. v. Torpey, (1871) 12 Cox CC 45]. The Criminal Justice Act, 1925 (c. 86), s. 47, abolishes this presumption of coercion by the
Res ipsa loquitur
evidence if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, Cox v. May Dept. Store Co., 903 P 2d 1119 (1995).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Pheasant
Pheasant. See GAME, and for larceny of young hen-hatched pheasants, see R. v. Corry, (1864) 10 Cox, 23.
Money had and received
is discussed. The cause of action arises when the money is received and not earlier, see Bowling v. Cox, 1926 AC 751 (754).
Molestation
act of intimidation, violence, shouting, hooting, etc., in contrast to peaceful persuasion, see R. v. Shepherd, (1869) 11 Cox CC 325. In matrimonial law, an act of serious annoyance. Also in Scots law, the name of an
Malicious prosecution
not the jury, to determine upon it, Abrath v. North Eastern R. Co., (1886) 11 App Cas 247; Cox v. English, Scottish and Australian Bank, 1905 AC 168. Animus injuri' cannot be inferred from the mere fact
Lord Mayor's Court in London
Lord Mayor's Court in London. An inferior [Cox v. Mayor of London, (1867) LR 2 HL 239] Court of the king, held before the lord mayor and aldermen. Its practice and procedure were amended and its...
Idem sonans
RESERVED); and see also Wells v. Cooper, (1874) 30 LT 721, where in an action of trespass Thomas Cox, a special juror, served by mistake for Thomas Fox on a common jury. And see MISNOMER.
Foreign Attachment
quit against the other after execution sued out by the plaintiff. Consult Brandon on Foreign Attachment, and see Cox v. Lord Mayor of London, (1867) LR 2 HL 239; Mayor of London v. London Joint Stock Bank,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free
Did you mean: cow?
Cox - Law Dictionary Search Results
Cox
Matched in: Term Cox
Coverture
[see Reg. v. Manning, (1849) 2 C&K 903]; but the presumption maybe rebutted [Reg. v. Torpey, (1871) 12 Cox CC 45]. The Criminal Justice Act, 1925 (c. 86), s. 47, abolishes this presumption of coercion by the
Res ipsa loquitur
evidence if the accident was of a kind that does not ordinarily occur in the absence of negligence, Cox v. May Dept. Store Co., 903 P 2d 1119 (1995).
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Pheasant
Pheasant. See GAME, and for larceny of young hen-hatched pheasants, see R. v. Corry, (1864) 10 Cox, 23.
Money had and received
is discussed. The cause of action arises when the money is received and not earlier, see Bowling v. Cox, 1926 AC 751 (754).
Molestation
act of intimidation, violence, shouting, hooting, etc., in contrast to peaceful persuasion, see R. v. Shepherd, (1869) 11 Cox CC 325. In matrimonial law, an act of serious annoyance. Also in Scots law, the name of an
Malicious prosecution
not the jury, to determine upon it, Abrath v. North Eastern R. Co., (1886) 11 App Cas 247; Cox v. English, Scottish and Australian Bank, 1905 AC 168. Animus injuri' cannot be inferred from the mere fact
Lord Mayor's Court in London
Lord Mayor's Court in London. An inferior [Cox v. Mayor of London, (1867) LR 2 HL 239] Court of the king, held before the lord mayor and aldermen. Its practice and procedure were amended and its...
Idem sonans
RESERVED); and see also Wells v. Cooper, (1874) 30 LT 721, where in an action of trespass Thomas Cox, a special juror, served by mistake for Thomas Fox on a common jury. And see MISNOMER.
Foreign Attachment
quit against the other after execution sued out by the plaintiff. Consult Brandon on Foreign Attachment, and see Cox v. Lord Mayor of London, (1867) LR 2 HL 239; Mayor of London v. London Joint Stock Bank,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free