Cook V State - Law Dictionary Search Results
Food
view to making it consumable by human beings undergoes a change of its conditions by the process of cooking, the derivative is none the less foodstuff, Welcome Hotel v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1983 SC 1015: … change of its conditions by the process of cooking, the derivative is none the less foodstuff, Welcome Hotel v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1983 SC 1015: (1983) 4 SCC 575: (1983) 3 SCR 674. Means the composite
Domicile
this enactment is inoperative. The domicile of a wife is that of her husband, A.-G. of Alberta v. Cook, 1926 AC 444. For the English Courts to have jurisdiction to entertain a suit for dissolution of marriage … of it. No one can be without a domicile and no one can have two domiciles, Yogesh Bhardwaj v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (1990) 3 SCC 355: AIR 1999 SC 356 (360). For the acquisition of a domicile
Food stuff
view to making it consumable by human beings undergoes a change of its condition by the Process of cooking the derivative is nonetheless foodstuff, Welcome Hotel v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1983) 4 SCC 575: AIR 1983 … undergoes a change of its condition by the Process of cooking the derivative is nonetheless foodstuff, Welcome Hotel v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1983) 4 SCC 575: AIR 1983 SC 1015 (1018). [Essential Commodities Act, 1955, s. 2(a)(v)]
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Annexation
to another, and see RES NULLIUS. As to concessions granted by the former sovereign prior to annexation, see Cook v. Sprig, 1899 AC 572. The financial liabilities of a conquered state are not after annexation binding on the
Watery coconuts
religious and social functions whereas dried coconuts are used mainly for extracting oil, Sidhi Vinayaka Coconut and Co. v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1974 SC 1111 (1114): (1974) 4 SCC 835: (1975) 1 SCR 440. [Central Sales … coconuts' are two distinct commodities commercially speaking. Watery coconuts are put to a variety of uses e.g. for cooking purposes, for religious and social functions whereas dried coconuts are used mainly for extracting oil, Sidhi Vinayaka Coconut
Cause of action
the litigant to frame the case appropriately to attract the jurisdiction either at Lucknow or at Allahabad, Nasiruddin v. State Transport Appellate Tribunal, (1976) 1 SCR 505: (1975) 2 SCC 671: AIR 1976 SC 331. A cause of … necessary for the plaintiff to prove in order to support his right to a judgment of the Court, Cooke v. Gill, 1873 LR CP 107: 42 LJ CP 98. In other words, a bundle of facts which
Consideration
the rights and be subject to the liabilities of a buyer as to that which he takes, Shakuntala v. State of Haryana, (1979) 3 SCC 226: AIR 1979 SC 843: (1979) 3 SCR 232. It means a reasonable … many conflicting decisions on the subject. Other instances of insufficient consideration or absence of consideration maybe found in:' Cooke v. Oxley, (1790) 3 TR 653, and other authorities (see Chitty on Contracts, 15th Edn. At pp. 9,
Trial
at the discretion of the Court or judge, and see R.S.C. Ord. XXXVI., rr. 2-6; also Keeling v. Cook, (1934) 78 LJNC 306, and JURY. In county courts parties are entitled to trial by jury unless the … of the proceeding in a criminal case after the charge had been framed against the accused, Vijay Kumar v. State, 1977 CLR J&K 37 (41): 1977 FAJ 526. Trial, is used in the sense of reference to a
Negligence
the ordinary course of things if those who have the management and control use due care, Syad Akbar v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1979 SC 1848: (1980) 1 SCC 30: (1980) 1 SCR 95. (iv) Negligence is a … of negligence will render a person liable for injury to infants than in the case of adults, see Cooke v. Midland Great Western Railway, 1909 AC 229; and Glasgow Corporation v. Taylor, (1922) 1 AC 44. There
Vegetable
include Pan (betel leaves). Therefore betel leaves are taxable under the provisions of the Act, Ram Bux Chaturbhuj v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1963 SC 351 (352). [Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954 (29 of 1954), s. 4] Vegetable, … prepared for market or the table. Vegetables and fruits are sometimes loosely, distinguished by the used need of cooking the former for the use of man, while the latter may be eaten raw; but the distinction often
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free