Skip to content

Compare Veeder V United - Law Dictionary Search Results

Research workspace

Save terms and build your research trail

A free trial unlocks notes, tags, search history, and the full AI Studio desk for judgment research.

Judgment

to allow the amendment, a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Prasant Chandra Sen v. United Commercial Bank, AIR 1982 Cal 555. An end to the suit or proceeding, the adjudication is indisputably a

McNabb-Mallory rule

McNabb-Mallory rule [after McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957), U.S. Supreme Court cases

McNabb-Mallory rule

the broader protections afforded under the Mioranda rule, the McNabb-Mallory rule is rarely applied in modern cases, McNabb v. United States, 318 US 332, 63 S.Ct. 608 (1943); Mallory v. United States, 354 US 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356

Keep your definitions linked to case research

Salary or wages

payment, or promise of payment of a price; and (4) the passing of the title, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252: (1953) SCR 1059: (1953) SCJ 373: (1953) SCA 408: 55 BLJR

Solicitor

1934 (24 & 25 Geo. 5, c. 45), passed as a result of the decision in Law Society v. United Services Bureau, (1934) 1 KB 343, which decided that 'person' in the 1932 Act meant natural person, so

Volenti non fit injuria

& Son, (1935) 1 KB 146; contra if the risk was undertaken voluntarily and not under duty, Cutler v. United Dairies (London) Ltd., (1933) 2 KB 297; and see Rescue and Voluntary Assumption of Risk, by Professor Goodhart,

Consummation

uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word

Consumption and use

uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word

Injunction

qualified by an adjective and, therefore, it would, comprehend both interim and perpetual injunc-tion, Cotton Corporation of India v. United Industries Ltd., AIR 1983 SC 1272 (1277): (1983) 4 SCC 625. [Specific Relief Act, 1963, s. 41(b)] This

Aggression

which may amount to aggression, Sarbananda Sonowal v. Union of India, (2005) 5 SCC 665; Chae Chan Ping v. United States, 130 US 581: 32 L ED 1068; Kawasaki v. Bantham SS. Co., (1938) 3 All ER 80

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

Try the research workspace - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial