Co V Patel - Law Dictionary Search Results
Rate
to describe a tax the basis of which can be capital value, Patel Gordhandas Hargovindas v. Municipality Commissioner, Ahmedabad, AIR 1963 SC 1742; Godhara Borough … Rate, A contribution levied by some public body for a public purpose, as a poor rate, a highway rate, a sewers … upon, as a general rule, the occupiers of property within a parish or other area. Proportional or relative value; the proportion of which quantity or value is adjusted, Black's Law Dictionary, 7th Edn., p. 1268. The term
Mistake
it is always unintentional. If it is intentional it ceases to be a mistake, West Bengal Electricity Board v. Patel Engg. Co. Ltd., AIR 2001 SC 682 (692): (2001) 2 SCC 451. … paying the forged cheque of a customer cannot charge the customer with the loss), and see Jones & Co. v. aring & Gillow Ltd., 1926 AC 670; but money paid under a mistake of law is ordinarily not
Entertainment
not entertainment. Unless the definition of 'entertainment' includes hospitality, the ordinary meaning of 'entertainment' cannot include hospitality, CIT v. Patel Bros. & Co. Ltd., (1995) 4 SCC 485: AIR 1995 SC 1829. A cinematograph show is 'entertainment' within
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Negligence
is also a peculiar duty to take precaution in the case of dangerous Articles, see Dominion Natural Gas Co. v. Collins, 1909 AC 640. This case should be distinguished from the principle in Fletcher v. Rylands, LR 3 … in Council v. Mt. Saliman, (1949) ILR 27 Pat 207: AIR 1949 Pat 388]; Poonam Verma v. Ashwin Patel, AIR 1996 SC 2111 (2116): (1996) 4 SCC 332. Negligence in common parlance means and imply 'failure to
Precedent
equality of votes, in the negative, and nothing but an Act of Parliament will remove them, London Tramways Co. v. London County Council, 1898 AC 75. The deci-sions of a judge at Nisi Prius are not considered binding. … and dispose of the case or the questions raised in the case, Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar v. Ratilal Motilal Patel, AIR 1968 SC 372. A Division Bench where it is unable to accept as correct the principle laid
Shall
interpretation is permissible, the statute ought to be construed as peremptory, G.C. Patel v. Agricultural Produce Market Committee, (1975) 2 SCC 482: Re Panchami, (1981) … conspectus of circumstances bearing on the importance of the condition have all to be considered before condemning a violation as fatal, State of Punjab v. Shamlal Murari, (1976) 1 SCC 719. Shall, does not always mean that … Shall, a word of slippery semantics in a rule is not decisive and the context of the statute, the purpose of the prescription, the public injury in the event of neglect of the
Employee
the factory but also persons employed in connection with the work of the factory, P.M. Patel and Sons v. Union of India, (1986) 1 SCC 32: AIR 1987 SC 447: (1985) Supp 3 SCR 55. A person … Employee, includes not only persons employed directly by the employer but also persons employed through a contractor. Moreover, they include not only persons employed in the factory but also persons employed in connection with the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
Try the research workspace - 7 days free