Chandra V The - Law Dictionary Search Results
Suspicious circumstances
normally expected in normal situation or is not expected of a normal person, Indu Bala Bose v. Manindra Chandra Bose, AIR 1982 SC 133 (134): (1982) 1 SCR 1188: (1982) 1 SCC 20. (Succession Act, 1925, ss.
Search and seizure
for the protection of social security and that power is necessarily regulated by law, M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, AIR 1954 SC 300 (302): (1954) SCR 1077. The executive power of 'search and seizure' is a necessary
Judgment
8. Refusing to allow the amendment, a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Prasant Chandra Sen v. United Commercial Bank, AIR 1982 Cal 555. An end to the suit or proceeding, the adjudication
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Shall
settled law that even wherthe expression 'shall' is used, the same may not be held to be mandatory, Chandrakant Uttam Chodankar v. Dayanand Rayu Mandrakar, AIR 2005 SC 547. Shall, may be remembered, does not always necessarily … to take action, Labour Commissioner v. Burhanpur Tapti Mills Ltd., AIR 1964 SC 1687: (1964) 7 SCR 484. (v) The use of the word 'shall' in a statute does not always indicate that the provisions are mandatory in
Law
by the State, that is to say, by the Union Parliament or the Legislatives of the States, Ram Chandra Prasad v. State of Bihar, AIR 1961 SC 1629: (1962) 2 SCR 50. It includes industrial law as
Proceeding
within it all matters coming up for judicial adjudication and not confine to a civil proceeding alone, Ram Chandra Aggarwal v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1966 SC 1888. Means the form and manner of conducting judicial
Possession
52 (55). [Arms Act, 1959, s. 29(b)] Possession must be conscious passion. Sub-Divisional Officer and Collector v. Gopal Chandra Khound, AIR 1971 SC 1190. 'Possession' or 'occupation' may take various forms and that even keeping the household
Business
definite meaning. Its perceptions differ from private to public sector or from institutional financing to commercial banking, Mahesh Chandra v. Regional Manager Uttar Pradesh Financial Corpn., AIR 1993 SC 935 (939): (1993) 2 SCC 279. [State Financial Corporation
Cruelty
spouse which causes mental suffering or fear to the matrimonial life of the other, Savitri Pandey v. Prem Chandra Pandey, AIR 2002 SC 591 (595): (2002) 2 SCC 73. [Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, s. 13(1)(ia)] Harassment of
Grounds
those conclusions were founded, they are different from subsidiary facts or further particulars or the basic facts, Prakash Chandra Mehta v. Commissioner and Secretary, Government of Kerala, AIR 1986 SC 687 (699): (1985) Supp SCC 144: (1985)
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free