Cf Watson V United - Law Dictionary Search Results
Subject to
that; answerable for, Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edn., p. 1278. Means this expression introduces a condition or proviso, Watson v. McAllum, (1902) 87 LT 547. Subject to, on a proper interpretation of s. 5, the expression 'subject to'
Party-wall
moieties, each moiety being subject to a cross easement in favour of the owner of the other moiety, Watson v. Gray, (1880) 14 Ch D 192. The common use of a wall separating adjoining lands of different owners
Net profits
Net profits, clear profits after all deductions, see Watson v. Haggitt, 1928 AC 127. [s. 42, Indian Trusts Act] Net profits, the 'net profits' means the divisible profits
Keep your definitions linked to case research
prior restraint
by publication) before the expression actually takes place see also Near v. Minnesota and New York Times Co. v. United States in the Important Cases section compare censorship, freedom of speech NOTE: In New York Times Co. v.
Judgment
to allow the amendment, a judgment in terms of clause 15 of the Letters Patent, Prasant Chandra Sen v. United Commercial Bank, AIR 1982 Cal 555. An end to the suit or proceeding, the adjudication is indisputably a
McNabb-Mallory rule
McNabb-Mallory rule [after McNabb v. United States, 318 U.S. 332 (1943) and Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449 (1957), U.S. Supreme Court cases
McNabb-Mallory rule
the broader protections afforded under the Mioranda rule, the McNabb-Mallory rule is rarely applied in modern cases, McNabb v. United States, 318 US 332, 63 S.Ct. 608 (1943); Mallory v. United States, 354 US 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356
Salary or wages
payment, or promise of payment of a price; and (4) the passing of the title, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252: (1953) SCR 1059: (1953) SCJ 373: (1953) SCA 408: 55 BLJR
Solicitor
1934 (24 & 25 Geo. 5, c. 45), passed as a result of the decision in Law Society v. United Services Bureau, (1934) 1 KB 343, which decided that 'person' in the 1932 Act meant natural person, so
Consummation
uses the goods and therefore 'consumes' them even though he does not keep them himself, State of Bombay v. United Motors (India) Ltd., AIR 1953 SC 252 (266). [Constitution of India, Art. 286(1) Expl.] 'Consumption' is a word
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free