Air 1964 Sc 81 - Law Dictionary Search Results
True copy
(1996) 5 SCC 181: AIR 1996 SC 1691 (1693); Murarka Radhey Shyam Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore, AIR 1964 SC 1545: (1964) 3 SCR 573: 1965 (1) SCJ 153. [Representation of the People Act, 1951, s. 81(3)]
Copy
true that nobody can by any possibility misunderstand it, Murarka Redhey Shyam Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore, AIR 1964 SC 1545 (1550). [Representation of the People Act (43 of 1951), s. 81(3)]
Property
the principles laid down in the Tilkayat, AIR 1963 SC 1638: (1964) 1 SCR 561 and Raja Birakishore, AIR 1964 SC 1501: (1964) 7 SCR 32 cases, Supreme Court was unable to endorse the view that the office of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Law
citizens whether they agree with it or not, Raj Kumar Nursing Pratap Singh Deo v. State of Orissa, AIR 1964 SC 1793 (1797). It includes any Ordinance, order bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom or usage having in the territory
Suit
claim should be one triable by a court, Maharana Bhagwat Singh Bahadur of Udaipur v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1964 SC 444: (1964) 5 SCR 1: (1964) 1 SCWR 258: (1963) 25 FJR 171: (1964) 1 LLJ 33. Suit,
Interest
101. As observed by this Court in Dr. Sham Lal v.. Commissioner of Income-tax, Punjab, (53 ITR 151: AIR 1964 SC 1878: (1964) 7 SCR 668: (1964) 2 SCJ 345: (1964) 1 SCWR 689.) the interest is a payment
Shall
or a District Industrial Court may also refuse to take action, Labour Commissioner v. Burhanpur Tapti Mills Ltd., AIR 1964 SC 1687: (1964) 7 SCR 484. (v) The use of the word 'shall' in a statute does not always … other circumstances, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Azad Bharat Finance Co., (1966) (Supp) SCR 473: (1967) 1 SCJ 815. Shall, in a statute, though generally taken in a mandatory sense, does not necessarily mean that in every
Precedent
view, Pratap Bahadur Sahi v. Lakshmidhar Singh, AIR 1946 PC 189: 73 IA 231; Vijaya Charari v. Khubchand, AIR 1964 SC 1099. Precedent, are not an immutable dogma. Courts may evolve principles which are applicable to the facts involved … Railways Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845, followed two Irish cases. In Chislett v. Macbeth & Co., (1909) 2 KB 815, Farwell, L.J., said: 'It is desirable that the decisions in the Scottish Court and in the Courts of
Paid
the amount of dividend unconditionally available to the member entitled thereto, J. Dalmia v. Commissioner of Income Tax, AIR 1964 SC 1866: (1964) 7 SCR 579. [Income Tax Act, 1922, s. 16(2)] The expression 'paid' in s. 16(2) does
Carucate
the s. to the entirety of the proceeding in a civil court, Major S.S. Khanna v. F.J. Dillon, AIR 1964 SC 497 (501): (1964) 4 SCR 409. [Civil PC, 1908, s. 115] 'Case' as used in the Art. 134(1)(c)
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free