Air 1940 Pc 11 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Umpire
Umpire, is a person who is to decide upon disagree-ment, Louis, Dreyfus & Co. v. Human Das Horchand, AIR 1940 Sind 37. Umpire, will get the same power as the arbitrators had, if their powers are restricted by
Kuhl
Kuhl, an irrigation channel from a stream, Dhani Ram v. Hamira, AIR 1940 Lah 398.
Upto
can be no complaint on the other side, Musharraf Hussain v. Agha Munawar Ali Khan, 186 IC 881: AIR 1940 Lah 7: 186 IC 881. Upto, Wednesday in a contract means that the offer remains open until midnight
Keep your definitions linked to case research
General custom of the Punjab
or by a local custom.' Young C.J., said in Mt. Simon v. Shahu, ILR 17 Lah 10 (11): AIR 1935 Lah 93, 'There is no such thing as general customary law known to the Legislature.' In Kesar
Judgment
State of Bihar v. Ram Naresh Pandey, AIR 1957 SC 389: (1957) SCR 279. (S. 494 of Cr PC, 1898). The word 'judgment' under s. 66(5) of the Act is the decision of the High Court of … nor does it terminate or dispose of the suit on any ground, Asrumati Debi v. Rupendra Deb Raikot, AIR 1953 SC 198: (1953) SCR 1159. An order of committal which terminates the pro-ceeding so far as the … Asrumati Debi v. Rupendra Deb Raikot, AIR 1953 SC 198: (1953) SCR 1159. An order of committal which terminates the pro-ceeding so far as the
Prathista
Prathista, means consecration, Rama Rao v. Venkata Ratnam, AIR 1947 PC 88: 230 IC 438: 1947 All LJ 365: 1947 All WR (PC) 25: 1947 Mad LJ
Succession to this office
the trustee has a beneficial interest of some sort or not. (See Ganesh Chander Dhur v. Lal Behari, AIR 1936 PC 318: 71 MLJ 740 and Bhabatatini v. Ashalata, AIR 1943 PC 89: 46 BLR 212) Ordinarily
Material witness
of the facts on which the prosecution relied. (AIR 1936 PC 289 relied), Narain v. State of Punjab, AIR 1959 SC 484 (487): 1959 Supp (1) SCR 724. [Criminal PC (5 of 1898), s. 208] The Court
Precedent
would inevitably result in upsetting titles long founded on the contrary view, Pratap Bahadur Sahi v. Lakshmidhar Singh, AIR 1946 PC 189: 73 IA 231; Vijaya Charari v. Khubchand, AIR 1964 SC 1099. Precedent, are not an
Fact discovered
they do not relate to the discovery of the knife in the house of the informant. AIR 1947 PC 67 followed, Mohd. Inayatullah v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1976 SC 483 (485): (1976) 1 SCC 828. [Evidence … it is produced and the knowledge of the accused as to this, Prabhoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1113 (1115). [Evidence Act 1872 (1 of 1872), s. 27] It is fallacious to treat the … as to this, Prabhoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1963 SC 1113 (1115). [Evidence Act 1872 (1 of 1872), s. 27] It is fallacious
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free