2005 1 Scc77 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Goods
of movable properties whether those propertices be tangible or intangible, Tata Constaltancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2005) 1 SCC 308. Electric energy is 'goods'. It can be transmitted, transferred, delivered, stored, possessed etc., in the same way … essential for an article to become goods is its marketability, Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (2005) 1 SCC 308; Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, (2001) 4 SCC 593; [Also Constitution of India, Art.
Conduct
2003 (C 41), s. 65 (UK)] Conduct, is all the conduct, King's Prosecutor, Brussels v. Cando Armas (DC) (2005) 1 WLR 1389 [Extradition Act, 2003 (C 41), s. 65(3) (UK)]
Judgment
so excluding further proceedings by way of appeal in the original action, Moy v. Pettman Smith (a firm), (2005) 1 WLR 581. … of one or the other, Gurdit Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1974 SC 1791 (1794): (1974) 2 SCC 260: (1974) 3 SCR 896. In finding out whether the order is a judgment within the meaning of
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Cause of action estoppel
to all points decided save and except allegation of fraud and collusion, Bhanu Kumar Jain v. Archana Kumar, (2005) 1 SCC 787 (798). (Civil Procedure Code, 1908, s. 11) Cause of action estoppel, arises where the cause of action
Modification
or 'omission', not amounting to or requiring an amendment will be a modification, Aon Trust Corpn. v. KPMG, (2005) 1 WLR (Ch). [See (English) Pension Schemes Act, 1993, s. 181; (English) Pension Act, 1995, ss. 56(2)(a), 60, 67, … include the making of additions and omissions, S.K. Gupta v. K.P. Jain, AIR 1979 SC 734: (1979) 3 SCC 54: (1979) 2 SCR 1184. [Companies Act, 1956, ss. 392, 391 and s. 2 (29)]
Decision
respect of which the House of Lords had granted leave to appeal, Regina (Jones) v. Ceredigion County Council, (2005) 1 WLR 3626 [Administration of Justice Act, 1969, s. 13(2)(a) (UK)] … the reasons which form the basis for arriving at the 'conclusions', Mukhtiar Singh v. State of Punjab, (1995) 1 SCC 760: AIR 1995 SC 686 (690). [Cr. PC, 1973, s. 354(1)(b)] Decision, a judgment. Decision, the word is
Dispute
with this section. For this purpose dispute includes any difference, CIB Properties Ltd. v. Birse Construction Ltd., (QBD) (2005) 1 WLR 2252 (Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act, 1996, s. 108) … claim by one party and its denial by the other', Canara Bank v. National Thermal Power Corporation, (2001) 1 SCC 43. The term 'dispute' means a controversy having both positive and negative aspects. It postulates the assertion of
Consent
Of course, the ultimate conclusion depends upon the facts of each case, Deelip Singh v. State of Bihar, (2005) 1 SCC 88. Two or more persons are said to consent when they agree upon the same thing in the
Custody
of which the Magistrate can entertain a bail petition of an accused, Sunita Devi v. State of Bihar, (2005) 1 SCC 608 (613, 614). (Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s. 439)
Deliberately absented himself
to the concept of deliberate absence and to the concept of a trial, Government of Albania v. Blefa, (2005) 1 WLR 3576. [Extradition Act, 2003 (41), s. 85(3)]
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free