Did you mean: 1995 8 sec 507?
1995 8 Scc 507 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Gaming
chance or of chance and skill combined. M.J. Sivani v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1995 SC 1770 (1772): (1995) 8 SCC 289.
Gaming house
whether by way of charge or otherwise, M.J. Sivani v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1995 SC 1770 (1772): (1995) 8 SCC 289.
Impracticability
incapable of being performed, Major Radha Krishan v. Union of India, AIR 1996 SC 3091 (3093): (1996) 3 SCC 507. The meaning of the term 'impracticable' in sub-rule (2) of Rule 14. In Major Radha Krishan case ((1996)
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Actus curiae neminem gravabit.
Bhardwaj, (1991) 2 SCC 128: AIR 1991 SC 373: Hanuman Vitamin Foods (P) Ltd, v. CCE , (1998) 8 SCC 336; Mansukhlal Vithaldas Chauhan v. State of Gujarat, (1997) 7 SC 622: AIR 1997 SC 3400; West Bengal
Occupation
of permanency attached, Corpus Juris Secundum, Vol. 67; see also T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481. It does not necessarily indicate the idea of profit. A man may have an occupation from which
Cause of action
in order to support his right to the judgment of Court, Hari Shankar Jain v. Sonia Gandhi, (2001) 8 SCC 233. The expression 'cause of action' is tersely defined in Mulla's Code of Civil Procedure: The 'cause of
Investigation
and the analysis by the public analyst do not amount to investigation, State of Rajasthan v. Shambhoogiri, (2004) 8 SCC 169 (173). [Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, s. 2(h)]
Minorities
the majority of the inhabitants of a given political entity, T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 8 SCC 481. The Constitution of India recognizes two categories of minorities, viz. religious minorities and linguistic minorities; have the
Consultation
purpose for which the provision for consultation is made, Justice K.P. Mohapatra v. Sri Ram Chandra Nayak, (2002) 8 SCC 1. Takes place by mutual discussions and a consensus is arrived at between different authorities performing different functions
Election
declaration of the result under s. 66 of the Act, Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, (2000) 8 SCC 216 (226). (Constitution of India, Art. 329) The word 'election' cannot be restricted only to the electoral process
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free