1 4 - Law Dictionary Search Results
Zur-i-peshagi lease (Zurpeshgidars)
Zur-i-peshagi lease (Zurpeshgidars), means a form of lease made in consideration of money advanced by lessee to lessor. The lease is a security for the amount advanced by the tenant to the lessor, Chulhan Singh v....
Feodum taliatum, i.e. hareditas in quandam certitudinem limitata
Feodum taliatum, i.e. hareditas in quandam certitudinem limitata [Lat.], fee-tail - that is, an inheritance within a certain limit.
Malecreditus, one of bad credit, who is not to be trusted, Fleta, 1.1, c. xxxviii.
Maledicta expositio qu' corrumpit textum. 4 Co. 35.-(It is a bad exposition which corrupts the text.)
Keep your definitions linked to case research
Actor sequitur forum rei (Branch, Max. 4)
Actor sequitur forum rei (Branch, Max. 4) [Lat.], The plaintiff follows the Court of the property.
Up to October 1, 1984
Up to October 1, 1984, the expression 'up to October 1, 1984' in the direction for regularisation obviously does no include appointments
Testimaignes ne potent testifie le negative, mes I affirmative
Testimaignes ne potent testifie le negative, mes I affirmative, witness cannot testify to a negative; they must testify to an affirmative
Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of sub-s. (1)
not intended to cut down the generality of the meaning of the preceding provision, King-Emperor v. Sibnath Banerji, 1945 FCR 195: AIR 1945 PC 156; Shiv Kirpal Singh v. V.V. Giri, AIR 1970 SC 2097 (2112): (1970)
Policy Proof of Interest (P.P.I.) (English)
interest. Such a policy in the absence of an insur-able interest is made void by the Gaming Act, 1845. The Marine Insurance Act, 1906 (s. 4), specifically declares such policies void. The Marine Insurance (Gambling Policies) Act,
Investigation
Investigation, s. 4(1) of the Code of Criminal Proce-dure, 1898 defines 'investigation' as to include all the proceedings under that Code for the collection of evidence conducted by
Sign-manual
Sign-manual. 1. The royal signature. Sometimes required by statute as evidence of the authority of the sovereign, e.g., by the … required by statute as evidence of the authority of the sovereign, e.g., by the Jud. Act, 1925, s. 4 (2), replacing Jud. Act, 1873, s. 31, interference to the transfer of a judge of the High Court
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Try the research workspace - 7 days free