1 4 - Judgment Search Results

1 - 4. Commissioner of Central Vs. M/S. New Vikram Cement

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. When the case was called none appeared on behalf of the respondents in spite of notice. In the

M/S. Sri Muthu Venkata the Income-tax Officer, Subramaniam Trust, Vs. ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

under sec.80G as well. It is against the above that the assessee has come in appeals before us. 4. We heard both sides in detail. 5. The assessee is a public charitable trust registered with Joint Sub … of Income-tax, rejecting the application filed by the assessee for obtaining registration under sec.12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The second appeal is filed against the order of the Commissioner Income-tax, rejecting the application filed by the

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. 1-4. M/S. Steel Stips Alloys Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. The Revenue filed this Reference for referring the following question of law: "1. Machine, Machinery, Plant, Apparatus, Tolls

Brij Bihari Singh Vs. Bihar State Financial Corporation and Ors.(R-1,4 ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

the appellant under suspension and initiated disciplinary proceedings on the following charges:- “1. He recommended release of Rs. 4.33 lakhs to M/s. Koshi Jute Mills Pvt. Ltd., Supaul against purchased machines without deducting the stipulated promoter's margin … State Financial Corporation (in short, “the Corporation”). At the direction of State Government, vide letter dated 20th March, 1993, the Managing Director of the Corporation, who is the Disciplinary Authority, put the appellant under suspension and initiated

M/S Lotus Gums and Chem.(P.) Ltd Vs. I.T.O.Ward-1(4),jodhpur

Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur

D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 3/2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 3/2010 M/s. Lotus … by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Topman Exports versus Commissioner of Income- Tax reported in [2012] 342 ITR 4.(SC), therefore, the present appeal is liable to be allowed, for the reasons given by the Hon'ble Apex Court

“9. It Is an Admitted Fact That Prior to 1.4.1991 the Work Vs. Megh ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Chaudhary, Advocate and Mr. R.K.Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The private respondents numbering 1 to 85 were the original applicants before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, claiming parity of pay scales … vide order dated 19.08.2002 which has also been upheld by the Hon’ble High Court, as pointed out above.”. 4. We are in complete agreement with the aforesaid view. It is undisputed that post 01.04.1991 a combined pattern

M/s. Carrier Race Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, C ...

Court: Chennai

Assessment Order dated 9.4.2015 bearing No: AABCR1863L/12-13/99 passed by the Respondent / Assessing Officer and quash the same.) 1. The impugned assessment order dated 27.03.2015 relating to PAN/GIR No. AABCR1863L for assessment year 2012-2013 and the Corrigendum

Veerabhadraswara Rice and Oil Mill, 1-4 No. 169/56, Vizianagaram City ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1961AP350

Inspector of Central Excise is stated to have made a surprise visit to the premises. He found that 12 tins of nigar oil weighing 4251/2 Ibs and 12 tins of groundnut oil weighing 420 Ids were kept … lessees hold a central excise licence in form L-4 for the manufacture of vegetable non-essential oils. Under Rule 47 of the Central Excise Rules, the manufacturer has to provide a store room as place of storage of

Chandra Enterprise Vs. Ito Ward 22(1)(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)96ITD341(Mum.)

relevant assessment year is 2002-03. The appeal is directed against the order of the CIT(A)-XXII at Mumbai on 19-8-2004 and arises out of the assessment completed under section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.The assessee … the revised return of income, the assessee-firm claimed higher amount of remuneration to partners in terms of section 40(b) of the income-tax Act, 1961.The assessing authority completed the assessment on the basis of the revised return of

Choice Aquaculture (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer 1(4)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2006)100ITD143(Ahd.)

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee and is directed against the order of CIT(A) dated 11-2-2005 … which empowers the court to pass any order in a case in order to do 'complete justice'." (pp. 477 and 478 of the report) This well-settled principle of law has also been accepted in the following decisions: