Us Supreme Court Court April 1964 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hattiesburg Unions Vs. Broome Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-27-1964
Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co. - 377 U.S. 126 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Hattiesburg Unions v. Broome Co., 377 U.S. 126 (1964) Hattiesburg Building & Trades Council v. Broome No. 669 Decided April 27, 1964 377 U.S. 126 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Syllabus State court had no jurisdiction to enjoin the arguably unfair labor practice of union picketing at a secondary employer's premise, since the National Labor Relations board had jurisdiction, its standards being satisfied by reference to the operation of either the primary or, as here, the secondary, employer. Certiorari granted: 247 Miss. 458, 153 So.2d 695, reversed. PER CURIAM. After finding that the primary employer was not in commerce and ruling that the preemption rule of San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U. S. 236 , was therefore not applicable, the state court enjoined picketing at the premises of the secondary employer. The judgment must be reversed. Th...
Cickelli Vs. Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-27-1964
CICKELLI v. OHIO - 377 U.S. 128 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court CICKELLI v. OHIO, 377 U.S. 128 (1964) 377 U.S. 128 CICKELLI v. OHIO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 791. Decided April 27, 1964. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. James F. Bell for appellant. Lynn B. Griffith, Jr. for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. MICHELL v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAMINERS, 377 U.S. 128 (1964) 377 U.S. 128 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court MICHELL v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAMINERS, 377 U.S. 128 (1964) 377 U.S. 128 MICHELL v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAMINERS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 890. Decided April 27, 1964. Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 245 La. 1, 156 So.2d 457. Thomas J. Meunier for appell...
Simpson Vs. Union Oil Co. of California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California - 377 U.S. 13 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California, 377 U.S. 13 (1964) Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California No. 87 Argued January 15-16, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 13 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondent oil company supplies gasoline in eight western States to numerous retailers, including petitioner, who lease outlets from respondent and enter into a "consignment" agreement under which respondent retains "title" to the gasoline until sold, pays property taxes thereon, and fixes the selling price therefor. Petitioner is compensated by a minimum commission, assumes operating costs and most types of losses on the gasoline, and carries personal liability and property insurance. The lease, like the "consignment" agreement, runs for a year, and is allegedly not renewable unless prescribed conditions are met, including the retailer's adherence to pr...
Labor Board Vs. Fruit Packers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
Labor Board v. Fruit Packers - 377 U.S. 58 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. Fruit Packers, 377 U.S. 58 (1964) National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760 No. 88 Argued February 18-19, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 58 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondent union, while on strike, conducted a consumer boycott of the employers' products, pursuant to which it engaged in peaceful picketing and distributed handbills at markets selling such products. The signs and handbills asked the public not to purchase primary employers' products. The National Labor Relations Board held that 8(b)(4) of the National Labor Relations Act was intended by Congress to prohibit all consumer picketing at secondary establishments. The Court of Appeals rejected that conclusion, holding that the crucial issue is whether the secondary employer is in fact coerced or threatened by th...
Labor Board Vs. Servette, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
Labor Board v. Servette, Inc. - 377 U.S. 46 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Labor Board v. Servette, Inc., 377 U.S. 46 (1964) National Labor Relations Board v. Servette No. 111 Argued February 19, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 46 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus In support of a strike against respondent, which is a wholesale distributor of food products, the union asked supermarket chain store managers to refrain from selling any goods supplied by respondent. It warned that handbills asking the public not to purchase those goods would be distributed at noncooperating stores, and handbills were in fact distributed at some stores. A complaint charging that the union's conduct violated 8(b)(4)(i) and (ii) of the National Labor Relations Act was dismissed by the National Labor Relations Board. The Board held that the appeal to supermarket managers did not fall within subsection (i), which makes it an unfair labor practice for a u...
Railroad Trainmen Vs. Virginia Bar
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar - 377 U.S. 1 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar, 377 U.S. 1 (1964) Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia ex rel. Virginia State Bar No. 34 Argued January 13, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Syllabus An injunction issued by a state court, prohibiting, as the unlawful solicitation of litigation and the unauthorized practice of law, a labor union from advising injured members or their dependents to obtain legal assistance before settling claims and recommending specific lawyers to handle such claims, infringes rights guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments. NAACP v. Button, 371 U. S. 415 , followed. Judgment and decree vacated, and case remanded. MR. JUSTICE BLACK delivered the opinion of the Court. The Virginia State Bar brought this suit in the Chancery Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia, Page 377 U. S. 2 against the Brotherho...
Fpc Vs. Texaco, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
FPC v. Texaco, Inc. - 377 U.S. 33 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court FPC v. Texaco, Inc., 377 U.S. 33 (1964) Federal Power Commission v. Texaco, Inc. No. 386 Argued March 25, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 33 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus 1. A Court of Appeals granted review of a Federal Power Commission (FPC) order concerning a contract performed in its circuit involving natural gas produced there by two respondent natural gas companies incorporated outside the circuit, the principal place of business of one (A) being within the circuit; that of the other (B) being without. Respondents proceeded under 19(b) of the Natural Gas Act, which provides for review in the court of appeals wherein the aggrieved natural gas company "is located or has its principal place of business." Held: The Court of Appeals erred in failing to dismiss the petition of respondent B for lack of venue, since the term "is located" in 19(b) means more tha...
Vokes Vs. City of Chicago
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO - 377 U.S. 124 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964) 377 U.S. 124 VOKES ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS. No. 855. Decided April 20, 1964. Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40. Charles A. Bellows for appellants. John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Page 377 U.S. 124, 125 378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court 378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964) 377 U.S. 124 378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION ADMINISTRATION ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845. Decided April 20, 1964. Appeal dismissed...
United States Vs. Welden
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
United States v. Welden - 377 U.S. 95 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Welden, 377 U.S. 95 (1964) United States v. Welden No. 235 Argued February 27, 1964 Decided April 20, 1964 377 U.S. 95 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Syllabus An indictment against appellee under the Sherman Act and Conspiracy Act concerned matters about which he had previously testified before a congressional subcommittee. The District Court dismissed the indictment, upholding appellee's contention that prosecution was barred under the immunity provision of the Act of February 25, 1903, providing that no person shall be prosecuted on account of any matter concerning which he testifies "in any proceeding, suit, or prosecution" under the Sherman Act and other specified statutes. Held: Appellee's testimony before the congressional subcommittee did not immunize him from prosecution, the Act of February 25, 1903, as amended in 1906, confining immuni...
Sanders Vs. Alabama
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1964
SANDERS v. ALABAMA - 377 U.S. 125 (1964) U.S. Supreme Court SANDERS v. ALABAMA, 377 U.S. 125 (1964) 377 U.S. 125 SANDERS v. ALABAMA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. No. 856, Misc. Decided April 20, 1964. Certiorari granted and judgment reversed. Petitioner pro se. Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 . Page 377 U.S. 125, 126 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »