Sanders Vs. Alabama

Sanders vs Alabama

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-20-1964

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100920

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100920
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Apr-20-1964
Case Number: 377 U.S. 125
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanders

Respondent

Alabama

Excerpt

sanders v. alabama - 377 u.s. 125 (1964) u.s. supreme court sanders v. alabama, 377 u.s. 125 (1964) 377 u.s. 125 sanders v. alabama. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of alabama. no. 856, misc. decided april 20, 1964. certiorari granted and judgment reversed. petitioner pro se. richmond m. flowers, attorney general of alabama, and david w. clark, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. gideon v. wainwright, 372 u.s. 335 ; draper v. washington, 372 u.s. 487 ; douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . page 377 u.s. 125, 126

Full Judgment

SANDERS v. ALABAMA - 377 U.S. 125 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court SANDERS v. ALABAMA, 377 U.S. 125 (1964) 377 U.S. 125

SANDERS v. ALABAMA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 856, Misc.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Certiorari granted and judgment reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama, and David W. Clark, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 ; Draper v. Washington, 372 U.S. 487 ; Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

Page 377 U.S. 125, 126

Same Parties Sanders vs Alabama Same Subject Land Acquisition