Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vokes Vs. City of Chicago

Vokes vs City of Chicago

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Apr-20-1964
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100919

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
US Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number
377 U.S. 124
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vokes

Respondent

City of Chicago

Excerpt

vokes v. city of chicago - 377 u.s. 124 (1964) u.s. supreme court vokes v. city of chicago, 377 u.s. 124 (1964) 377 u.s. 124 vokes et al. v. city of chicago. appeal from the supreme court of illinois. no. 855. decided april 20, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 28 ill. 2d 475, 193 n. e. 2d 40. charles a. bellows for appellants. john c. melaniphy, sydney r. drebin and robert j. collins for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 377 u.s. 124, 125 378 realty corp. v. new york rent & rehab. admin., 377 u.s. 124 (1964) 377 u.s. 124 (1964) "> u.s. supreme court 378 realty corp. v. new york rent & rehab. admin., 377 u.s. 124 (1964) 377 u.s. 124 378 realty corp. et al. v. new york city rent and rehabilitation administration et al. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 845. decided april 20, 1964. appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. reported below: 13 n. y. 2d 902, 193 n. e. 2d 510. harris l. present and irving s. freedman for appellants. beatrice shainswit for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Full Judgment

VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO - 377 U.S. 124 (1964)
U.S. Supreme Court VOKES v. CITY OF CHICAGO, 377 U.S. 124 (1964) 377 U.S. 124

VOKES ET AL. v. CITY OF CHICAGO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 855.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 28 Ill. 2d 475, 193 N. E. 2d 40.

Charles A. Bellows for appellants.

John C. Melaniphy, Sydney R. Drebin and Robert J. Collins for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 377 U.S. 124, 125


378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., <a href="/100919"> 377 U.S. 124 </a> (1964) 377 U.S. 124 (1964) "> U.S. Supreme Court 378 REALTY CORP. v. NEW YORK RENT & REHAB. ADMIN., 377 U.S. 124 (1964) 377 U.S. 124

378 REALTY CORP. ET AL. v. NEW YORK CITY RENT AND REHABILITATION
ADMINISTRATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 845.
Decided April 20, 1964.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below: 13 N. Y. 2d 902, 193 N. E. 2d 510.

Harris L. Present and Irving S. Freedman for appellants.

Beatrice Shainswit for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.



Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial