Us Supreme Court Court June 1963 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
United States Vs. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank - 374 U.S. 321 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court United States v. Philadelphia Nat'l Bank, 374 U.S. 321 (1963) United States v. Philadelphia National Bank No. 83 Argued February 20-21, 1963 Decided June 17, 1963 374 U.S. 321 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Syllabus Appellees, a national bank and a state bank, are the second and third largest of the 42 commercial banks in the metropolitan area consisting of Philadelphia and its three contiguous counties, and they have branches throughout that area. Appellees' boards of directors approved an agreement for their consolidation, under which the national bank's stockholders would retain their stock certificates, which would represent shares in the consolidated bank, while the state bank's stockholders would surrender their shares in exchange for shares in the consolidated bank. After obtaining reports, as required by the Bank Merger Act of 1960...
YellIn Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
Yellin v. United States - 374 U.S. 109 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109 (1963) Yellin v. United States No. 35 Argued April 18-19, 1962 Restored to the calendar for reargument June 25, 1962 Reargued December 6, 1962 Decided June 17, 1963 374 U.S. 109 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Petitioner was summoned to appear as a witness before the House Committee on Un-American Activities, which was investigating infiltration of Communists into the steel industry. Petitioner's counsel telegraphed the General Counsel of the Committee, requesting that petitioner be permitted to testify in an executive session, because that would avoid "exposing witnesses to publicity." Without authorization, the Committee's Staff Director replied by telegram that the request was denied. At the beginning of the hearing several days later, petitioner's counsel tried to have these telegrams read into the record, but this wa...
Rosenberg Vs. Fleuti
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
Rosenberg v. Fleuti - 374 U.S. 449 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449 (1963) Rosenberg v. Fleuti No. 248 Argued March 26, 1963 Decided June 17, 1963 374 U.S. 449 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Respondent is an alien who was admitted to this country for permanent residence in 1952 and has been here continuously since, except for a visit of "about a couple hours" duration to Ensenada, Mexico, in 1956. After administrative proceedings, he was ordered deported on the ground that, at the time of his return in 1956, he was "afflicted with psychopathic personality" within the meaning of 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, and, therefore, was excludable under 241(a)(1). The District Court sustained the deportation order, but the Court of Appeals set it aside on the ground that, as applied to respondent, 212(a)(4) was unconstitutionally vague. Held: 1. This Court ought not to pass on ...
Bradley Vs. Iowa
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
BRADLEY v. IOWA - 374 U.S. 490 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court BRADLEY v. IOWA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 BRADLEY v. IOWA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA. No. 934, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 254 Iowa 211, 116 N. W. 2d 439. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. Page 374 U.S. 490, 491 MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court MAYS v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 490 (1963) 374 U.S. 490 MAYS v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 871, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: See 205 Cal. App. 2d 798, 23 Cal. Rptr. 605. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent...
Dearhart Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
DEARHART v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 498 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 498 (1963) 374 U.S. 498 DEARHART v. VIRGINIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA. No. 48, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 . MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360. Page 374 U.S. 498, 499 ...
Chavez Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
CHAVEZ v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 493 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court CHAVEZ v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 493 (1963) 374 U.S. 493 CHAVEZ v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1113, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 208 Cal. App. 2d 248, 24 Cal. Rptr. 895. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. TRAUB v. CONNECTICUT, 374 U.S. 493 (1963) 374 U.S. 493 (1963) "> U.S. Supreme Court TRAUB v. CONNECTICUT, 374 U.S. 493 (1963) 374 U.S. 493 TRAUB v. CONNECTICUT. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT. No. 1285, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 150 Conn. 169, 187 A. 2d 230. Petitioner pro se. John D. LaBelle and Harry W. Hultgren, Jr. for respondent. PE...
Jones Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
JONES v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 501 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 501 (1963) 374 U.S. 501 JONES v. CALIFORNIA. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 649, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 204 Cal. App. 2d 722, 22 Cal. Rptr. 499. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 . MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360. Page 374 U.S. 501, 502 ...
Holmes Vs. Wainwright
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
HOLMES v. WAINWRIGHT - 374 U.S. 506 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court HOLMES v. WAINWRIGHT, 374 U.S. 506 (1963) 374 U.S. 506 HOLMES v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. No. 780, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Petitioner pro se. Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahorner, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 . Page 374 U.S. 506, 507 ...
Head Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
HEAD v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 509 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court HEAD v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 509 (1963) 374 U.S. 509 HEAD v. CALIFORNIA. ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI. No. 872, Misc. Decided June 17, 1963. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied; certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: See 208 Cal. App. 2d 360, 25 Cal. Rptr. 124. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and A. Wallace Tashima, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but the motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 . MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. J...
School Dist. of Abington Tp. Vs. Schempp
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1963
School Dist. of Abington Tp. v. Schempp - 374 U.S. 203 (1963) U.S. Supreme Court School Dist. of Abington Tp. v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania v. Schempp No. 142 Argued February 27-28, 1963 Decided June 17, 1963 * 374 U.S. 203 APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Syllabus Because of the prohibition of the First Amendment against the enactment by Congress of any law "respecting an establishment of religion," which is made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, no state law or school board may require that passages from the Bible be read or that the Lord's Prayer be recited in the public schools of a State at the beginning of each school day -- even if individual students may be excused from attending or participating in such exercises upon written request of their parents. Pp. 374 U. S. 205 -227. 201 F.Supp. 815, affirmed. 228 Md. 239, 179 A.2d 698, reversed...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »