Dearhart Vs. Virginia

Dearhart vs Virginia

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100522

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100522
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1963
Case Number: 374 U.S. 498
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dearhart

Respondent

Virginia

Excerpt

dearhart v. virginia - 374 u.s. 498 (1963) u.s. supreme court dearhart v. virginia, 374 u.s. 498 (1963) 374 u.s. 498 dearhart v. virginia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of appeals of virginia. no. 48, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. petitioner pro se. reno s. harp iii, assistant attorney general of virginia, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . mr. justice clark and mr. justice harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in douglas v. california, 372 u.s., at 358, 360. page 374 u.s. 498, 499

Full Judgment

DEARHART v. VIRGINIA - 374 U.S. 498 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court DEARHART v. VIRGINIA, 374 U.S. 498 (1963) 374 U.S. 498

DEARHART v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF
VIRGINIA. No. 48, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.

Page 374 U.S. 498, 499

Same Parties Dearhart vs Virginia Same Subject Right to Information