Jones Vs. California

Jones vs California

Type Court Judgment Court US Supreme Court Decided Jun-17-1963

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/100525

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/100525
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided On: Jun-17-1963
Case Number: 374 U.S. 501
Subject: Contract

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Contract

Key legal issue: Contract

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jones

Respondent

California

Excerpt

jones v. california - 374 u.s. 501 (1963) u.s. supreme court jones v. california, 374 u.s. 501 (1963) 374 u.s. 501 jones v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the district court of appeal of california, second appellate district. no. 649, misc. decided june 17, 1963. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 204 cal. app. 2d 722, 22 cal. rptr. 499. petitioner pro se. stanley mosk, attorney general of california, and william e. james, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of douglas v. california, 372 u.s. 353 . mr. justice clark and mr. justice harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in douglas v. california, 372 u.s., at 358, 360. page 374 u.s. 501, 502

Full Judgment

JONES v. CALIFORNIA - 374 U.S. 501 (1963)
U.S. Supreme Court JONES v. CALIFORNIA, 374 U.S. 501 (1963) 374 U.S. 501

JONES v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
CALIFORNIA, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 649, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 204 Cal. App. 2d 722, 22 Cal. Rptr. 499.

Petitioner pro se.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U.S., at 358, 360.

Page 374 U.S. 501, 502

Same Parties Jones vs California Same Subject Contract