Years - Judgment Search Results

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(190)ELT355TriDel

2. Applicants filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 2,08,48,009/-. The demand was confirmed on the...

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1558; 1997(95)ELT450(SC)

1. The only question that falls for consideration in these appeals is whether inner tube valves imported by the appellants...

Shijin, 20 Years, S/O.Alexander and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

O R D E R V. RAMKUMAR, J. ............................. B.A. No. 6656 of 2010 .......................................... Dated: 26th day of October,...

Good Year (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC151

1. In this Appeal, filed by M/s. Good Year (India) Ltd., the issue involved is whether the rubberized and

Good Year India Ltd. Vs. C.C., Icd

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

then the provisions regarding filing of a claim within 1 year or 6 months would become redundant as the Appeal proceedings

Jesna, 16 Years (Minor) Vs. Shihabudheen P. and Others

Court: Kerala

ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, MANJERI DATED2802-2011 ------------------------------------------------------------- APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER(S): ----------------------------------------------- JESNA, 16 YEARS (MINOR) D/O.KUNHIMOHAMMED REPRESENTED BY GUARDIAN GRAND FATHER MOIDEEN71YEARS, S/O.BEERAN, PALOORAN

Good Year India Limited, Convent Road,ponnurunny and Another Vs. P.C. ...

Court: Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

on 3.12.03 and that it had a warranty for 3 years. On 5.2.05 a bulge on the tyre was noticed. On

Good Year India Limited Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1995]97STC249(AP)

turnover relating to sales of transmission relating for the assessment year 1986-87. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the

Good Year India Ltd., Jaipur Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipu ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1969Raj95; (1968)IILLJ682Raj

extended into almost every sphere of administration until, not many years ago, an unexpected reaction set in. The hypothesis, on which

Year Mamud Mondal Vs. Paomocha Sarkar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1925Cal1225

in holding that this document is a lease granting 10 years' enjoyment of the fishery and, therefore, as such, it must