X Raying - Judgment Search Results

Sonoline X-ray and Pathological Center Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

himself registered under the Assam General Sales Tax Act. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is providing X-Ray and Sonography services to his clients and since he not a dealer of the X-Ray and Sonographic plates

Doctors X-ray and Pathology Institute P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Director of ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)227CTR(All)546; [2009]318ITR125(All); [2010]186TAXMAN186(All)

as incorporated in its memorandum of association, works in the field of medical diagnostics by providing facilities of x-ray, pathology and ultrasound images. Dr. H.R. Agarwal, Dr. Sita Ram Agarwal, Dr. K.R. Agarwal and Dr. Mrs. Chitralekha

The X-ray and Allied Products Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1983]54STC121(Mad)

Sethuraman, J.1. This appeal has been filed against the order of the Board of Revenue dated 14th May, 1980, suo motu revising the order of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner dated 19th May, 1979. In the appeal...

Doctors X-ray and Pathology Institute Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1961]42ITR185(All)

references under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, made at the instance of the assessee Doctors X-Ray & Pathology Institute Ltd., Kanpur. The question propounded for our answer is as follows :'Whether the income-tax authorities

X-ray Diagnostic Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1999)(65)ECC622

Image Intensification System, a captively designed camera and monitor, etc. which can only work in conjunction with any X-Ray System for medical purposes; (b) A number of affidavits of various Doctors and Radiologists have been submitted by

State Bank of India Vs. Zeenath X-ray and Ecg Clinic and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD506; 2008(3)ALT134

time?12. The admitted facts may be stated thus:13. The first defendant is a partnership firm doing business in X-ray and ECG Clinic. The defendants 2 to 6 are the partners of first defendant firm as per Ex.A2.

income Tax Officer Vs. Arihant X-ray and Sonography

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2007)111TTJ(Ahd.)528

except small amount of interest does not have the capacity to give loan to the extent of Rs. 10,00,000, therefore, her creditworthiness is not proved at all. As regards Dr. Asim Shah, he observed that the assessee

Collector of Customs Vs. Rama Krishna X-ray Institute

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)LC147Tri(Delhi)

importer appellants, the ld. Advocate submits that the equipment imported is essentially an apparatus based on use of X-Rays and accompanied by items like TV Cameras and Monitors, which are specially designed to work as parts of

A.K. Hazarika Vs. Saraighat X-ray and Clinical Laboratory

Court: Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

that he did not consult any Specialist, at Guwahati before going to Madras. 6. It is true that X-ray and clinical laboratory tests are supposed to be done carefully by recording impression. But in the case in

Collector of Customs Vs. Kiran X-ray Screens Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT264TriDel

1. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are apparent on record that the Respondents imported 200 kgs. Calcium Tungstate and the goods were assessed to duty under Chapter 32.04/12(1) of CTA and Countervailing duty was...