X Ray - Judgment Search Results

Sonoline X-ray and Pathological Center Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court: Guwahati

himself registered under the Assam General Sales Tax Act. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner is providing X-Ray and Sonography services to his clients and since he not a dealer of the X-Ray and Sonographic plates

Doctors X-ray and Pathology Institute P. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Director of ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2009)227CTR(All)546; [2009]318ITR125(All); [2010]186TAXMAN186(All)

as incorporated in its memorandum of association, works in the field of medical diagnostics by providing facilities of x-ray, pathology and ultrasound images. Dr. H.R. Agarwal, Dr. Sita Ram Agarwal, Dr. K.R. Agarwal and Dr. Mrs. Chitralekha

The X-ray and Allied Products Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1983]54STC121(Mad)

Matched in: Parties The X-ray and Allied Products Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Doctors X-ray and Pathology Institute Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income- ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1961]42ITR185(All)

references under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, made at the instance of the assessee Doctors X-Ray & Pathology Institute Ltd., Kanpur. The question propounded for our answer is as follows :'Whether the income-tax authorities

X-ray Diagnostic Centre Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1999)(65)ECC622

Image Intensification System, a captively designed camera and monitor, etc. which can only work in conjunction with any X-Ray System for medical purposes; (b) A number of affidavits of various Doctors and Radiologists have been submitted by

State Bank of India Vs. Zeenath X-ray and Ecg Clinic and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(4)ALD506; 2008(3)ALT134

time?12. The admitted facts may be stated thus:13. The first defendant is a partnership firm doing business in X-ray and ECG Clinic. The defendants 2 to 6 are the partners of first defendant firm as per Ex.A2.

income Tax Officer Vs. Arihant X-ray and Sonography

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (2007)111TTJ(Ahd.)528

Matched in: Parties income Tax Officer Vs. Arihant X-ray and Sonography

Collector of Customs Vs. Rama Krishna X-ray Institute

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)LC147Tri(Delhi)

importer appellants, the ld. Advocate submits that the equipment imported is essentially an apparatus based on use of X-Rays and accompanied by items like TV Cameras and Monitors, which are specially designed to work as parts of

A.K. Hazarika Vs. Saraighat X-ray and Clinical Laboratory

Court: Assam State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Gauhati

that he did not consult any Specialist, at Guwahati before going to Madras. 6. It is true that X-ray and clinical laboratory tests are supposed to be done carefully by recording impression. But in the case in

Collector of Customs Vs. Kiran X-ray Screens Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT264TriDel

Matched in: Parties Collector of Customs Vs. Kiran X-ray Screens Limited